Replies

So I take it you disagree with some of the quoted sources? how's come?

Because they're garbage "written by 'bigots, rightwing christians, homophobes'". More specifically, while I'm far from an expert, I know a little bit about statistical analysis, scientific method, research bias, representative sampling, etc.

For example: "An exhaustive study in The New England Journal of Medicine, medical literature's only study reporting on homosexuals who kept sexual "diaries," indicated the average homosexual ingests the fecal material of 23 different men each year."

That "exhaustive study" involved 102 homosexual men -- hardly "exhaustive" and hardly representative of the "average homosexual".

Another: "Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do", "Violence and Homosexuality", & "Homosexual Rape and Murder of Children" were all written by the same man, Paul Cameron. Cameron is a well-recognized fool, hijacking data from legitimate sources to promote his own agenda. What is that agenda? Well, he's also been quoted as saying "Marital sex tends toward the boring end. Generally, it doesn’t deliver the kind of sheer sexual pleasure that homosexual sex does."(Rolling Stone, March 18, 1999)

And "gay nazis"? Sorry, but the leading Jewish groups and nazi-hunters don't seem to recognize it.

I could go on for days about the crap from Cameron, but I'd probably be wasting my time. Go ahead and use Remedy's sources.

How to do Fraudulent Research on Homosexuality

The same can be said of the "pro" homosexual sources...and has been. I agree that a sample of 100 is hardly exhaustive but neither is a sample of a few hundred as was the case in the study highly touted and rushed forth as "conclusive evidence" that children are not harmed by mo parents. Heck, the only reason we are having this discussion is because of poor science in the first place. The science that led to the "delisting" of mo-ism as a mental disorder based on the EL WRONGO "theory" that it is genetic and therefore "untreatable" and therefore "normal". That is simply bogus on its face. People born with a congenital defect are not "normal" and we do not "pretend" that they are. It is also pretty obvious that mo's do not relate to the world "normally" esp. vis a vis children.

I do not know what a "homophobe" is since the basic construct of the word is a lie in itself. We all know that "phobia" means "fear" in this case of 'mo's. And I assure you, I do not fear them. That is complete garbage and is DELIBERATELY meant to be an epithet and to dismiss any discussion scientific or civil. Anyone who disagrees with the concept of mo-ism as normal is "homophobic"? Thats as perverted as their precept of normality.

You have read, I assume, the article that headed this thread, concerning the indoctrination of kids and the attacks on parents who disagree. Do you think that if mo-ism were such a provable "scientific" fact, you would need to do that? Do you have to "indoctrinate" people to believe that the world is round or that one and one is two? I think not.

I do not send a child to school to be "indoctrinated" in the newest social fad. you can see for yourself the "agenda" of the jerks at GLSEN. They are just sweet innocents valiantly waging the struggle? They are nothing more than isidious perverts. But, according to you, to object, is to be homophobic.

AIDS has not declined. We have cleaned up the blood supply at great cost due to the stupid acts of those people. They are costing us billions for "research" and some even actively seek the disease out. This is something we should just "accept" and support? That is bs of the highest order. Tell you what, subsitute "heroin use" for 'mo-ism and see how silly that sounds.

I could go on and on about this also. But if you're a convert, I am probably wasting my time also.