Skip to comments.
Is it right to give what one person earns to another?
nashvillecitypaper.com ^
| 17/04/03
| Walter E. Williams
Posted on 04/17/2003 8:25:00 AM PDT by Jakarta ex-pat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Jakarta ex-pat
As usual, Walter E. Williams is brilliant in his analysis. Thanks for posting it.
2
posted on
04/17/2003 8:31:15 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(A conservative who conserves -- a true capitalist!)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Is it right to give what one person earns to another? No, it isn't. But with the 16th Admendment, who is to stop the government? ..."by any source derived". Does that mean the technique, or by the well the water is drawn from?
3
posted on
04/17/2003 8:32:19 AM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(If I keep my eyes on Jesus, I could walk on water - Audio Adrenaline)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
"Redistribution of Wealth" BUMP!
4
posted on
04/17/2003 8:33:56 AM PDT
by
CaptainJustice
(Dangerous Jesus Lover)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Remeber kids its not nice to call it "Communism" anymore...
It's called "Global Democracy" now..and the UN is its PIMP.
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Nice article bump!!
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Immoral acts such as theft, rape and murder don't become moral when done collectively through a majority decision.This is going to become my tagline. Great article.
7
posted on
04/17/2003 9:00:41 AM PDT
by
B. Rabbit
(Can I get a witness?)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
I wholeheartedly agree with his premise. Now I'd love to see a proposed workable solution. It is
not going to happen through our current political system, not ever. The royal ruling class that has been created is simply too seductive. Good people with good intentions get there and fall prey quickly to the old "power corrupts" adage. Bottom line is that our government is broken beyond peaceful repair and I don't see this country rising up in revolution anytime soon. Any other thoughts?
MM
To: Jakarta ex-pat
To get at the answer, we must first ask where Congress gets the resources to finance these programs. All except the most naive would recognize that neither the Tooth Fairy nor Santa Claus supplies Congress with the money. That means Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. Now we can ask the moral question: Is it right to take, through threats, intimidation and coercion, what one American has earned and give it to another American who has not earned it? Or put another way: Is it right for one person to be forcibly compelled to serve the purposes of another person?
WOW! Great article.
To: B. Rabbit
Good idea. I'm going to take a tag line for him as well. Check it out.
10
posted on
04/17/2003 9:16:09 AM PDT
by
RAT Patrol
(Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Great article bump.
11
posted on
04/17/2003 9:24:30 AM PDT
by
Lev
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Ayn Rand fans would say that we heard all these arguments before, summed up nicely in about 850 pages.
12
posted on
04/17/2003 9:27:08 AM PDT
by
ko_kyi
To: Jakarta ex-pat
How else is government paid for?
13
posted on
04/17/2003 9:32:44 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Read my tag line.
14
posted on
04/17/2003 9:33:08 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Great post!
15
posted on
04/17/2003 9:36:42 AM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
( Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
"As a sidebar, it's most disappointing that black Americans are some of the strongest advocates for forcibly compelling one person to serve the purposes of another. Isn't that what slavery was all about?"
16
posted on
04/17/2003 9:47:09 AM PDT
by
gcruse
(The F word, N word, C word: We're well on our way to spelling 'France.')
To: MississippiMan
We need voters and candidates.
I don't fully agree with the good people, good intentions thing. In addition, their politics must be correct, legal, moral. ie: candidates must obey the Constitution and Bill of Rights. If the candidate is well steeped in these rules, then the fear is more of the system killing the candidate than of him being perverted by the system.
I don't know that we have time -- the generation(s) to get it done -- but I do think a move to educate the population in order to produce votes for candidates that would follow the Constitution and Bill of Rights is worth the try.
Brains, Bullhorns and Ballots can hopefully keep the bullets and blood out of it.
17
posted on
04/17/2003 10:05:18 AM PDT
by
FreeRadical
(Buy Kids Books & Guns. Help them love liberty & hate the nanny state.)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Is it right to give what one person earns to another?
Yes, as long as the giver was a willing giver. Taking it with threat of force or imprisonment is not at all right.
18
posted on
04/17/2003 10:08:40 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(Go Fast, Turn Left!)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Walter Williams is The Man!!
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Is it right to give what one person earns to another? Of course!
It's called taxes.
Get with the program, Walter.
20
posted on
04/17/2003 10:21:31 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(Californians are as dumm as a sack of rocks)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson