Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blix Wants Inspectors in Iraq
Associate Press via Yahoo News ^ | 17 April 2003 | TONY CZUCZKA

Posted on 04/17/2003 7:44:32 AM PDT by SkyPilot

Blix Wants Inspectors in Iraq

By TONY CZUCZKA, Associated Press Writer

BERLIN - The chief U.N. weapons inspector for Iraq (news - web sites) urged the U.S.-led coalition to allow his team back into the country to look for weapons of mass destruction, saying that would increase the credibility of any discoveries, a magazine reported Thursday.

Hans Blix, who was in charge of searches for chemical and biological weapons and long-range missiles in Iraq, also challenged President Bush (news - web sites)'s administration to present proof of its allegation that Syria has chemical weapons.

"Whoever claims this should, in the interests of credibility, very quickly present the relevant proof," Blix said in an interview with the German weekly Der Spiegel. "For my part, I doubt that the Syrians would have been enthusiastic to serve as a depot of weapons of mass destruction for Baghdad."

Weapons inspectors left Iraq days before war in Iraq began. In explaining their decision to invade, the United States and Britain charged that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s regime had weapons of mass destruction.

"Now we will see whether London and Washington were right," Blix told Der Spiegel. "I am very curious and can only wish them luck in their search."

The Bush administration, which blamed Blix for hampering its drive to win international support for war, has not invited U.N. inspectors to take part in disarming postwar Iraq. Instead, the United States has tried to hire away some inspectors and has deployed its own teams to search for weapons of mass destruction.

Blix said internationally backed inspections would have "considerably more credibility."

"The alliance came as liberator and occupier, and that can prove to be a disadvantage," he told the magazine. "If its experts now should really discover weapons of mass destruction, their authenticity might be called into question."

Reports on Iraqi weapons programs that the inspectors received from intelligence agencies were "pretty pathetic" and led to no discoveries of weapons of mass destruction, Blix said.

The chief nuclear weapons inspector, Mohamed ElBaradei, even received forged documents meant to persuade the inspectors that Iraq had nuclear weapons ambitions, Blix said. He gave no details.

Blix, who has been invited to brief the U.N. Security Council on April 22, called for efforts to declare the entire Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction, "naturally including Israel."

Israel is widely believed to have nuclear weapons, though it has not officially acknowledged having them.


TOPICS: Announcements; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blix; fat; jerk; windbag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: SkyPilot

he has no idea he has NO credibility


21 posted on 04/17/2003 7:58:06 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
He wants to double check that all evidence of weapons of mass destruction have been removed.
22 posted on 04/17/2003 7:58:30 AM PDT by Consort (Use only un-hyphenated words when posting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: SkyPilot
AHA HAAA HA HHHAAAA HAA HA OH AH HAW AA HA .

Sorry that is just to funny.

24 posted on 04/17/2003 7:59:56 AM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Now we will see whether London and Washington were right," Blix told Der Spiegel. "I am very curious and can only wish them luck in their search."

To me, that sounds very much like he knows something more about the location of those "non-existant" WMDs. He needs to be intenstly questioned.

25 posted on 04/17/2003 8:02:04 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
"The alliance came as liberator and occupier, and that can prove to be a disadvantage," he told the magazine. "If its experts now should really discover weapons of mass destruction, their authenticity might be called into question."

Announcer: "Blix steps to the mound, winds up, and delivers the long slow curve for the French-German-Russian team...meanwhile back at the U.N.the search for a relief pitcher continues as Bush and his team continue to hit the ball out of the park."

26 posted on 04/17/2003 8:03:34 AM PDT by fuzzthatwuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
10-1, HE DOES CONTINUE TO GET A U.N. PAYCHECK.
27 posted on 04/17/2003 8:03:36 AM PDT by AMNZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: m1911
But it is not a good idea.

Blix has shown he could not find his own backside with both hands in broad daylight even with the assistance of an inspection team.

The sole motivation for this ploy is arrogance. Plain and simple.

And the USA is going to be blamed and criticized for everything under the sun anyway, primarily by those who hate us mostly out of jealousy. So exactly who cares about those people?

Not this guy.

28 posted on 04/17/2003 8:03:42 AM PDT by Houmatt (Where is Scott Speicher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
No thanks, he was retired
29 posted on 04/17/2003 8:05:03 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Shalom!

Hi...SkyPilot

WE already have the Real Inspectors in Iraq...

Thousands Of UNITED STATES MARINES and US SPECIAL OPS!!!

Hans Blix (The Nazi in a business suit) and Coffi Anan (I have totally forgotten that I come from a sub Third World Country) should be brought before an International Court and Tried for Lying to the World and Helping Saddam to pursue his Life Style Of Crimes against Humanity...his own people.

30 posted on 04/17/2003 8:05:57 AM PDT by Simcha7 (GOD Bless and Protect Our TROOPS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: m1911
Same here, all though I think Blix and his inspectors are incompetant fools, letting them in and showing them our finds, and having Blix declare we were right all along would be the equivelent of sticking a hot poker in the eye of the Euro-trash scum that did every thing in their power to stop us.
31 posted on 04/17/2003 8:06:29 AM PDT by sean327
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Blix said internationally backed inspections would have "considerably more credibility."

Like Scott Ritter?

Geez. Did you know that "Blix" means "Lightning" in Swedish? Wonder where it hit ;).

32 posted on 04/17/2003 8:15:07 AM PDT by Cachelot (~ In waters near you ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
SkyPilot,

Standard 'Rat media practice.

Don't you find it interesting that this AP article is just so absolutely inflammatory?

Completely without challenge, Blix is allowed to spew his Socialist lies and innuendo. Like Iraqi propaganda, this reads more like a manifesto, or a marketing release, than news. Not a word about Blix's own credibility problems, the CNN cover-up of human rights atrocities, the greeting of free Iraqis, the undetected weapons caches, mobile labs, possible WMD sites.

Contrast this with articles that challenge Blix, the United Nations, the French, etc. Charges and accusations against the United Nations and Blix simply are not allowed to be stand-alone articles.

More proof that socialist media conspires to push the collectivist agenda.

Throughout the Clinton era, no criticism of Clinton appeared in print without including ample counterattacks by Carville, or the designated White House spokesliar of the day, or Hillary, etc.

In fact, it was more likely that any article would headline the counterattack (Clinton rejects GOP lies) than the original accusation (Clinton caught with pants down).

A reader would assume they missed the original article on the subject - but, of course, none existed.

The lesson?

The Left cannot be debated, convinced or persuaded. It can only be vanquished.


33 posted on 04/17/2003 8:21:43 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom (To smash the ugly face of Socialism is our mission)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom
AP?

All Propaganda


34 posted on 04/17/2003 8:22:29 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom (To smash the ugly face of Socialism is our mission)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cachelot
Like Scott Ritter?

Well, as long as we are at it---suuuure! Come on in Scott! We might as well bring on Crusty the Clown too. Sheesh!

"Go ahead--take your mugshot! I know Johnny Cochran!"

35 posted on 04/17/2003 8:31:31 AM PDT by SkyPilot (CNN Reports--You Decide! (well,,,,,,not really))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
 
E-mail Kofi: sg@un.org
 
E-mail U.N. General Assembly President

U.N. mass e-mail links:  http://progressiveaustin.org/email_un.htm

''I, (insert name of U.S. elected official) do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States (not the UN Charter) against all enemies*, foreign and domestic (including organizations that threaten the Law of our Land); that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same (the US Constitution, NOT the UN Charter); that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God." .... (not "so help me": *Kofi, Clinton, Blix, Chirac, Jackson, Carter, Mandela, Soros, Saban, Sarandon, Moore, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR, NY Times, Pfaw, ACLU, Sierra Club, NOW, NAMBLA, NARAL, PP, Amnesty Int'l, ANSWER, WWP, "Mother Earth", Allah, Buddha  or the United Nations).''

36 posted on 04/17/2003 8:35:55 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (The time is long overdue to stop taking the media, as well as the U.N., so seriously -Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cachelot
I believe we should make them an offer. We will allow the return of inspectors under the following conditions.
1. We approve the inspectors chosen.
2. Any permanent member of the security council found to have violated sanctions will relinquish veto powers.
3. Any member nation in violation of sanctions shall be expelled from the UN.



37 posted on 04/17/2003 8:38:21 AM PDT by Kadric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
And, as my late granny used to say, people in Heck want ice water!
38 posted on 04/17/2003 8:39:31 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Blix Wants Inspectors in Iraq

I want a pony!

39 posted on 04/17/2003 8:43:47 AM PDT by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Give Blix a compass and map and tell him to start walking. On the slim chance he can find Iraq, have him arrested if he shows up.
40 posted on 04/17/2003 9:06:14 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson