To: bert
Two thoughts.
If this is all true then the disclosure of WMD might be a contingent part of the deal and parties on both sides are waiting for full compliance before disclosing.
Second, I guess will not be able to use the "human shield" trojan horse again soon. (Any chance the shields in Israel are maybe agents ? )
10 posted on
04/17/2003 7:44:37 AM PDT by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
Second, I guess will not be able to use the "human shield" trojan horse again soon.My first thought when I read that was that in future military actions, human shields will be not only unwelcome, but will probably be assumed to be CIA. Well, now, won't that be a shame? (not!)
27 posted on
04/17/2003 8:13:44 AM PDT by
MizSterious
("The truth takes only seconds to tell."--Jack Straw)
To: VRWC_minion
I'm not so certain about whether we can or cannot use "human shield" as a future cover, but in the worst case two things will happen. One, all those idiots will be looking at each other wondering which ones are "plants" (note to self: try to resist making puns about the human shield have broccoli for brains) and two, any regime they try to help out will probably tell them all go go f**k off.
Sounds to me like at worst we have pulled the plug on the "Human Shield" movement.
41 posted on
04/17/2003 8:27:44 AM PDT by
katana
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson