Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jonathanmo
Excuse me. Did that decision say that n*, like tigers were dangerous animals????? Animals????? That decision sounds racist to me! Sue them! Meanwhile I gotta keep an eye on that 'respectable looking' family of obviously 'dangerous animals' up the street from me. Mom is weeding the flower bed right now, no telling what sort of *dangerous* behaviour she'll resort to next!
80 posted on 04/17/2003 9:49:25 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Black Agnes; jonathanmo
If you go and read the brief, it's easy to see that "Dr." Winn's offered testimony is a crock. The supposition that the substitution of "tigers" for the n-word likens black to animals is her opinion, apparently based on absolutely NO fact. "Dr." Winn expertise is in philosophy; she is an "educator". I think that says it all.
89 posted on 04/17/2003 10:03:18 AM PDT by FourPeas (Iran is not a simple sentence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson