Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armchair Generals-Why we were wrong in our war criticism.
Wall St Journal ^ | 4-17-03 | PERRY SMITH

Posted on 04/17/2003 5:00:09 AM PDT by SJackson

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:48:42 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The "armchair generals" who have been providing commentary on the Iraq war for television, radio, newspapers and magazines have taken much flak. Having been one those analysts since 1991, let me comment critically on my own performance and that of my colleagues.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: accountability; armchairgenerals; iraqifreedom; perrysmith
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 04/17/2003 5:00:09 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Fox, Tom McInerney and Paul Vallely. They all are providing insightful and generally accurate analysis.

The best of all retired analysts of the Battle of Iraq was Colonel David Hunt.

The History Channel needs to hire this dude toute suite, or better yet, FoxNews should keep him. He could be like 'the Judge' Napolitano, the resident analyst on all things judicial.

2 posted on 04/17/2003 5:04:22 AM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The best *armchair general* was Col. Hunt..Fox News.
3 posted on 04/17/2003 5:06:09 AM PDT by mystery-ak (The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
My hat is off to this gentleman. He is truely accepting of personal repsonsibility. I'd like to see the other military 'analysts', especially that craven ass Clark, do the same.
4 posted on 04/17/2003 5:07:55 AM PDT by x1stcav (HooAhh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done and why. Then do it.

Heinlein
5 posted on 04/17/2003 5:08:33 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ( clinton is a raping traitor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Two of the military analysts have serious political ambitions in the postwar period and want to become well known to the American public.

Wesley Clark and who else?

6 posted on 04/17/2003 5:09:11 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Col. Hunt and Lee Armey should do a show together on the History Channel. OooRah!
7 posted on 04/17/2003 5:09:51 AM PDT by Packer Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
I agree. Hunt was the most direct and useful. Also accurately portrayed the capabilities of our armed forces. He was credible and un-assuming. The older soft-spoken general they had on from time to time was good as well -- usually working the goofy FoxNews screenwriter
8 posted on 04/17/2003 5:11:06 AM PDT by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
have serious political ambitions

The political ambitions of one of them are purely laughable.

9 posted on 04/17/2003 5:12:50 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The "hidden agenda" problem: Two of the military analysts have serious political ambitions in the postwar period and want to become well known to the American public. By serving that agenda, they tend to be very careful with their remarks and hence less insightful than those analysts with no political agenda

Who??? Clark and McCaffey? If so, what aspirations? Inquiring minds need to know?

10 posted on 04/17/2003 5:13:15 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Evidently Col. Hunt wasn't considered by the author because he wasn't a "general."
11 posted on 04/17/2003 5:14:14 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (California wine beats French wine in blind taste tests. Boycott French wine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
The best *armchair general* was Col. Hunt..Fox News.

This is not unusual, actually. While a very few generals are deep thinkers and great tacticians/strategists, (McArthur in both categories, Patton in the latter), for the most part generals are selected for other talents - tenacity, smoothness, public presentability, military diplomacy. The guys who are really good at intelligence analysis, understanding and thinking about new tactics for new technologies, reorganizing doctrine to take into account revolutionary ideas in warfare, etc,. generally make it to colonel. Only exceptionally do they get above that pay grade. For the most part, on a command staff, it is the colonels who spend the days and nights sweating and thinking out a plan. Generals have 18 hr a day calendars with appointments, meetings and briefings. Not to take away their decisionmaking role - but figuring out all except the broadest of details of a plan is not their role. In fact, the planning process usually has several different colonels brining in plans that are discussed and debated and melded together to produce the final plan.

12 posted on 04/17/2003 5:18:20 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Generals are elitists.
13 posted on 04/17/2003 5:18:23 AM PDT by mystery-ak (The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
14 posted on 04/17/2003 5:18:30 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I assume that is why Hackworth wasn't mentioned.I will turn the channel next time he's on.
15 posted on 04/17/2003 5:21:01 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
As my hubby says, *once you make General, you become a politican*...and he is right.
16 posted on 04/17/2003 5:21:54 AM PDT by mystery-ak (The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Clark = Clinton
17 posted on 04/17/2003 5:21:56 AM PDT by astounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Evidently Col. Hunt wasn't considered by the author because he wasn't a "general."

Warden (who he mentions) is a retired Colonel.

What about the guy on CNN - Christmas? Chrissom?

18 posted on 04/17/2003 5:22:35 AM PDT by SkyPilot (CNN Reports--You Decide! (well,,,,,,not really))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Packer Pete
Col. Hunt and Lee Armey should do a show together on the History Channel. OooRah!

I'd like Col. Hunt and Jane Skinner on a Fox show. OooRah!

19 posted on 04/17/2003 5:22:41 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Hackworth insight:

"Everyone is stupid but me. Look at me in my black turtleneck!!!"
20 posted on 04/17/2003 5:24:02 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson