Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: breakem
We are not so far off overall, so maybe we should just agree to disagree on Graham. I see banning Graham as a violation of his religious freedom, so I am not flexible on that.
72 posted on 04/16/2003 1:51:35 PM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: RAT Patrol
re 72. Please cite to me where or how religious freedom gives him the right to preach at a givernmental employee event. No one has a right to be heard.
75 posted on 04/16/2003 1:54:20 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: RAT Patrol
I see banning Graham as a violation of his religious freedom

That's ridiculous. If the Pentagon won't have Louis Farrakhan come in to talk to them, are they violating him? How about that guy who kidnapped Elizabeth Smart? Is his religious freedom being violated because he can't speak at the Pentagon? The government shouldn't have ANY religious services, PERIOD.

78 posted on 04/16/2003 1:56:21 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson