That is correct. It did not affect the slave owning states that remained loyal to the Union.
That is incorrect. Lee freed slaves left to his wife from her father's estate in December 1862, a few days before the Emancipation Proclamation became effective. Grant had owned a slave for a short period in his life but granted the man freedom when he moved to Illinois in 1859. Grant's wife had use of several female slaves belonging to her father for various periods in their married life, including early in the war. But Missouri records show that the Dent family slaves were freed in January or February of 1863. In any event Missouri ended slavery through constitutional amendment in January 1865. Finally Grant couldn't have owned any slaves when the 14th Amendment was ratified slavery had been ended by ratification of the 13th Amendment in December 1865.
Yes.
Also, is it true that Robert E. Lee freed his slaves before the War, but U.S.Grant's wife's slaves were freed only when the 14th Amendment was passed?
No.
Slavery clearly was protected by the Constitution. It was a state affair. Lincoln invoked the war power of the president to free slaves in areas where the federal government had no control. The slave power held that slaves were property, right? Seizing property was a well known concept in the law of war. That was Lincoln's rationale.
Lee held slaves until the beginnning of 1863. I don't believe he ever filed papers on some, saying that the war freed them.
There is at least one account of Lee ordering the flogging of one of his slaves who tried to escape.
Lee said in an 1865 letter that the best relation of whites to blacks was master and slave.
Grant had one slave, whom he freed in 1859. His wife owned no slaves although some of her father's were in her employ early in the war. Those slaves were freed when Missouri outlawed slavery before the end of the war.
Walt
he UNLAWFULLY freed some slaves which his WIFE received by legacy (this in the Commonwealth of VA is NOT a "technicality";we have, since the early 1700s had "femme sole" laws, as well as "dower & curtsy", which allow women to own separate property from their family/husband.- had he NOT been "a Lee", he would have been arrested for freeing someone else's slaves (some pigs, as orwell said, really are more equal than other pigs.)!
the "emancipaton proclamation" free NOBODY, as it applied ONLY to those areas under rebel control! SOME slaves in the NORTH were freed more than a YEAR after Richmond fell.
FRee dixie,sw