Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nolu chan
Which is what I've been saying all along. Chief Justice Chase believed that ratification of the 14th Amendment made any trial and conviction of Davis unconstitutional on 5th Amendment grounds. Was I not clear?
940 posted on 05/07/2003 4:57:00 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 939 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Which is what I've been saying all along. Chief Justice Chase believed that ratification of the 14th Amendment made any trial and conviction of Davis unconstitutional on 5th Amendment grounds. Was I not clear?

WHAT YOU SAID WAS:

The comments you quoted are the result of speculation on what might have happened had Davis been tried before the 14th Amendment had passed.

You cast my comments as applying to what might have happened had Davis been tried before the 14th Amendment had passed.

My comments clearly applied to what did happen after the 14th Amendment had passed.

My comment was about concern regarding the right of Davis to appeal to the Supreme Court. In real life, the Executive could not get the case heard in the Virginia circuit until Chase was good and ready. After the 14th Amendment was passed, Chase was good and ready.

944 posted on 05/07/2003 5:53:56 AM PDT by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson