Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nolu chan
705 nolu chan] But seriously, he makes no legal argument. He could have had his case heard in court. He did everything possible to prevent that from happening.

709 Walt] Such as?

MY POST NUMBER 663

During the ACW, Congress curtailed the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court...

Oh, -Congress- did.

You said President Lincoln did.

I guess you were just a little confused.

Abraham Lincoln and every one else who participated in these events is long dead. They faced situations that you have not, and they reacted in a certain way. You attempt to besmirch what they found laudable -- I mean President Lincoln -was- re-elected in a landslide, after all.

Making modern day judgements on historical people is just silly. Even in 1866, there was an entirely different set of circumstances facing the Justices, and they, like the Justices of WWI and WWII, reacted differently than they did during war time. They were only human -- just like Lincoln was. You throw up your hands in dsgust at actions that they found on the whole pretty reasonable. It doesn't seem like you are interested in a fair or even useful examination of these events.

Walt

717 posted on 05/01/2003 10:22:06 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
[Wlat] You attempt to besmirch what they found laudable -- I mean President Lincoln -was- re-elected in a landslide, after all.

I see your point. This proves he is in good company.

1972

Richard M. Nixon
520 electoral votes
46,740,323

George McGovern
17 electoral votes
28,901,598

726 posted on 05/01/2003 1:37:56 PM PDT by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson