Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
So your rational then is that anything that in any way impedes the government's waging of a war the way it so chooses is "treasonous."

That is pretty much what the Court has said during the ACW, WWI and WWII.

Walt

682 posted on 04/27/2003 4:37:53 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
So in other words, when a war comes along you think the Constitution goes out the door the second it becomes an inconvenience. By the way, you have still to show exactly what, if anything, Taney did that was "treasonous." That is because you cannot.

Like it or not, Walt, the real acts of treason were committed against the States of Virginia, Missouri, Maryland, North Carolina etc. etc. etc.

685 posted on 04/27/2003 2:27:38 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson