Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
And yet Congress indicated that his action was necessary and proper.

An ex post facto law is unconstitutional, Wlat. Try again.

It was certainly within the purview of the Congress to applaud General Jackson and refund penalty and interest to him. And it is a strong indication on how they viewed the issue. You are applying hindsight and malice in your interpretation.

Walt

638 posted on 04/25/2003 11:39:56 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
It was certainly within the purview of the Congress to applaud General Jackson and refund penalty and interest to him.

No. Congress is banned from passing Ex Post Facto laws by the Constitution. Try again.

640 posted on 04/25/2003 11:44:47 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson