Nonsense.
It's not nonsense to anyone who goes back and looks at #318. Although this is sure to be a small group -- they will see that you cut and pasted parts of two notes together to suggest something I never said.
Walt
I seriously question how you can function in society, or whether you really are posting from an insane asylum. At times you appear quite lucid - and the times you post your own thoughts, actually present a better argument than when you rely on cut-and-paste delusions.
In #318, GOPCapitalist wrote:
"Events may prove it otherwise; and if they see their interest in separation, why should we take side with our Atlantic rather than our Missipi descendants? It is the elder and the younger son differing. God bless them both, & keep them in union, if it be for their good, but separate them, if it be better." - Thomas Jefferson, to John C. Breckinridge, August 12, 1803 (emphasis mine)
You replied to 318 (everything below are your comments - not a citation & reply):
That has nothing to do with the nature of the Union.I replied in #350, citing your #325, and including the bolded comments below:"We are all Republicans--we are all Federalists. If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is free to combat it."
Thomas Jefferson March 4, 1801
Walt
That has nothing to do with the nature of the Union.So your ludicrous assertion that I "cut and pasted parts of two notes together to suggest something [you] never said" is easily refuted.[Jefferson - ] "
We are all Republicans--we are all Federalists.If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union ..."