Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
The confederate constitution did not mince words. The judicial power of the confederacy was to be vested in one supreme court and such other courts as the congress would establish.

That it did, but if you look at the record of debates from the Confederate Senate, they sought to block its appointment to limit what they feared would be judicial activism infringing on state power. If you recall, the senate has oversight on appointments to the court and can block those appointments from being filled if they so desire. To do so is within their constitutional authority.

409 posted on 04/17/2003 10:45:47 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
That it did, but if you look at the record of debates from the Confederate Senate, they sought to block its appointment to limit what they feared would be judicial activism infringing on state power. If you recall, the senate has oversight on appointments to the court and can block those appointments from being filled if they so desire. To do so is within their constitutional authority.

To violate the constitution was within their constitutional authority? Neat system, like I said, in keeping with the overall contempt for the courts that the Davis regime had.

419 posted on 04/17/2003 11:20:58 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson