Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sequoya
Your own post nailed you. Any other tyrant lovers care to try to spin away the facts?

You haven't posted any facts within the proper context.

I guess that is what I do in these threads -- provide context.

Walt

140 posted on 04/16/2003 10:29:57 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
So that's what you call that fantasy-drivel? Uhh....o.k.
141 posted on 04/16/2003 10:32:45 AM PDT by rebelyell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyPapa; Sequoia; stand watie; rebelyell
I guess that is what I do in these threads -- provide context.

Wlat did not have context with this thread. (nor did his hero have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky)

151 posted on 04/16/2003 11:36:40 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD, FRM, RFA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyPapa
All tyrants claim that necessity makes unlawful actions lawful just as Lincoln did in the quote you posted. Saddam claimed gassing the Kurds was necessary because they were revolting against the government.

You and the rest of the left love Lincoln because he followed your philosophy that the ends justify the means. You like the fact that he destroyed the union and the Constitution so you justify his actions. He meant well so whatever he did is OK with you.

The left still operates on that premise today. Socialism is good because the socialists mean well even though they make matters worse with their actions. Clinton meant well so his actions are excused.

Your defense of the dictator is no different. After WWII most Germans excused Hitler’s actions because he got them out of the depression. The average German only criticized Hitler’s overreaching military actions.

The same is true with the Lincoln apologists. Lincoln’s destruction of the union and the Constitution ended slavery so is actions are excused. It is one of the great failings of all socialists that they put more value on their perception of someone’s motives than on the acts or the consequences of the acts.

Now, how about quoting where that law is that makes it legal for nonresidents to vote in an election or for the military to watch you mark your ballot? Tell us where that law is. Also quote where the Constitution gives the president that right. I’m sure Clinton or Algore would love to know about that part of the Constitution.

Face it Walt, you are an apologist for a dictator and a tyrant and can’t stand it when you are exposed.
156 posted on 04/16/2003 12:09:52 PM PDT by Sequoya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson