Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. Wants An End To Lenient Policies on Drugs
Reuters ^ | April 15, 2003

Posted on 04/15/2003 12:24:19 PM PDT by Wolfie

U.N. Wants An End To Lenient Policies on Drugs

Vienna -- The head of a U.N. conference on narcotics called on countries on Tuesday to abandon lenient and inconsistent policies towards cannabis and other drugs and instead start vigorously implementing international drug-control treaties.

Patricia Olamendi, global affairs undersecretary at Mexico's Foreign Ministry and chairwoman of the U.N. conference, told reporters such inconsistency was undermining the fight against the trafficking and use of narcotics.

The United Nations has already criticised Britain for downgrading cannabis to a low-risk, category C drug. While possession of small amounts of cannabis in Britain is now only a minor offence, in places like the United States it can be a very serious crime.

"They can't expect us in our countries to put a halt to drug crop cultivation while they keep those policies," said Olamendi, whose country is one of the main cannabis producers and accounts for most of North America's annual seizures of the herb.

Olamendi said is was very likely the 46th session of the U.N. Commission on Narcotic Drugs, underway at the U.N. office in Vienna, would end on Thursday with an appeal for certain countries to cease being permissive.

"We will leave with an appeal to countries that are being permissive or lenient...not to allow such policies," she said.

She also said that some countries were not effectively applying international drug control treaties and she said the conference would demand an end to this.

"There has to be implementation of international agreements and these resolutions have to be followed up," Olamendi said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: addiction; drugwar; globalgoons; neoconnews; unitednations; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

1 posted on 04/15/2003 12:24:19 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Just another reason the UN has outlived its usefulness. How obvious that they want to be the global government.
2 posted on 04/15/2003 12:27:45 PM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Somewhere...there is another young liberal couple just waiting for THEIR chance.
Support Free Republic and dash their hopes!


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


3 posted on 04/15/2003 12:27:47 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams; *Wod_list; MrLeRoy; okiesap; philman_36; jmc813
Oh, come now, I'm sure a lot of our fellow FReepers would agree, sometimes you need an all powerful international body to make sure sovereign nations don't go around doing things their own way.
4 posted on 04/15/2003 12:31:05 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
SOunds like an instant REVENUE GENERATOR!~} All the Bribes coming into the UN to leave certain nations alone and turn a blind eye. Otherwise why go all out on a war that can never be won?
5 posted on 04/15/2003 12:31:15 PM PDT by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Would you just love to see random drug testing at the General Assembly and the security council....a great way to cut down debate...you can't speak until you pee.
6 posted on 04/15/2003 12:31:38 PM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Here's a golden oldie from June 2000:

High UN Official Calls for Global Attack on Internet Drug Information

The UN official in charge of the global body's international drug control office called last week for a crackdown on the use of the Internet in the drug trade. But his comments left unclear whether he draws a distinction between the use of the Internet to disseminate information about drugs and drug policy and its use in criminal activity by drug trafficking organizations.

Pino Arlacchi, head of the UN Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention (ODCCP, http://www.undcp.org), based in Vienna, told a New York press conference last Thursday that his organization will explore giving "universal jurisdiction" to Internet drug crimes because cyber crime so easily evades traditional national jurisdictions.

Under international law, the only crimes that now qualify for universal jurisdiction are genocide and crimes against humanity.

Because of the global nature of the drug trade, Arlacchi told the press conference, "It is extremely difficult to route a case into a precise jurisdiction, so we believe this problem is encouraging us to go in the direction of universal jurisdiction."

He said the idea will be explored in depth at a UN symposium at year's end in Palermo, Italy, to mark the signing of an international convention on organized crime. The symposium will address expanding universal jurisdiction to money laundering and Internet crime.

Arlacchi admitted, however, that use of the Internet in actual drug trafficking or for online drug sales is "very small, it is minimal."

Arlacchi's remarks provided hints that he has more than drug traffickers' use of the Internet in mind. The former Italian Mafia prosecutor added that, "The Internet is more and more important in providing exchanges of information, in expanding the market, particularly the final market, and we are very worried about it."

Arlacchi said that by searching one key word, which he refused to identify, "You receive advice on where to find drugs, you receive a lot of extremely dangerous information."

Even worse, in the drug bureaucrat's view, "You can enter a completely different world where the issue [drug policy] is treated in the opposite view as it should be. Unfortunately, some of these views are spreading and we are now thinking about some instrument to at least stop the expansion of this flow of information."

The preceding statement appears clearly directed not at drug traffickers but at organizations and individuals expressing policy preferences different from those of the UN ODCCP.

To Sarah Andrews, policy analyst for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit civil liberties organization (http://www.epic.org), Arlacchi's remarks "sound like an argument for censorship."

Andrews told DRCNet that Arlacchi's proposal should be seen in context. "This is part of a larger attempt to control the Internet on the international level," she noted. "The European Union has drafted similar legislation," she said, adding that "this reprises the arguments about cryptography, where law enforcement officials spoke of dire threats but the number of crimes linked to it is really small."

Andrews said EPIC would oppose such a move by the UN. "This is an exaggerated response to a small problem," she said. "There is a need for security," she added, "but giving law enforcement more access to private communications only gives them overreaching powers."

Another UN drug agency, the International Narcotics Control Board, has called on nations to restrict the right of their citizens to discuss drug legalization. (See http://reason.com/9808/col.coffin.html for an excellent discussion by Phil Coffin in Reason magazine.)

Arlacchi drew charges of lacking realism after he spearheaded a major UN drug summit in 1998; the summit's title was "Drug Free in Ten Years: We Can Do It."

7 posted on 04/15/2003 12:31:58 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Wow...The UN is actually wrong on all the "Issues" it confronts....or should I say attempts to confront.
8 posted on 04/15/2003 12:34:02 PM PDT by Ga Rob (I'm not the cause of your problems.....you are!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
The UN is concerned about lenient drug policies.

How about doing something about the Congo and proving that you're not uselss and irrelevant?

9 posted on 04/15/2003 12:34:03 PM PDT by amused (Republicans for Sharpton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
"Just another reason the UN has outlived its usefulness. How obvious that they want to be the global government."

Yeah, but would Ashcroft agree with you on this? This goes right along with his Operation Headhunter.
10 posted on 04/15/2003 12:36:35 PM PDT by thetruckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thetruckster
Its kinda nice to think about Conservatives like Ashcroft finding a reason to cozy up to the U.N., in an "I'd Like To Teach The World to Sing" kind of way.
11 posted on 04/15/2003 12:39:35 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie; Dane
hey, Dane, it's the UN again supporting your view on drugs

must not be funded by Soros
12 posted on 04/15/2003 12:40:39 PM PDT by vin-one (I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Drugwarriors and the UN = bedfellows. LOL
13 posted on 04/15/2003 12:41:46 PM PDT by gcruse (If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
14 posted on 04/15/2003 12:42:49 PM PDT by jmc813 (The average citizen in Baghdad,right now, has more firearm rights than anyone in our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vin-one
I have some free time for a few months, I was wondering, where do I apply to become a paid poster?
15 posted on 04/15/2003 12:43:23 PM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
sometimes you need an all powerful international body federal government
 to make sure sovereign nations individual adults don't go around doing things their own way.
16 posted on 04/15/2003 12:43:52 PM PDT by gcruse (If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
George Soros is gonna be furious when he hears about this.
17 posted on 04/15/2003 12:44:26 PM PDT by jmc813 (The average citizen in Baghdad,right now, has more firearm rights than anyone in our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Sounds like they're trying to drive prices up.
18 posted on 04/15/2003 12:44:53 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Hmmm, the UN is the U.S. writ large. Go figure.
19 posted on 04/15/2003 12:46:59 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bigfootbob; Dane; Wolfie; MrLeRoy
contact Dane, he can hook you up with the UN. or Wolfie,/MrLeroy from Soros, ha ha...
let me know how much it pays, I could post for either side,
been seeing it way to much....
20 posted on 04/15/2003 12:47:58 PM PDT by vin-one (I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson