[diamond6]

The Constitution provides the right to bear arms. However, just because there is a right, doesn't mean there are no limitations to the right. For instance, you may have a right to free speech, but does that allow you to yell, "Fire" in a theater, when there is no fire? You may have the right to freedom of religion, but if your religion requires human sacrifice, is Congress prevented from passing laws prohibiting it?

[FSPress]

The Constitution provides the right to bear arms. However, just because there is a right, doesn't mean there are no limitations to the right.

====
I understand what you are saying, I think. One last question and then I will quit. Does the Constitution provide the right to keep and bear arms because of the need for a well regulated militia?

[spunkets]

" when there is no fire"

Nor does the 2nd allow justification for the use of arms to infringe on the rights of others. The right to arms is not a right ot use them improperly. the same goes for Free speech. The right does not justify it's improper use.

[FSPress]

The Constitution provides the right to bear arms.

====

I do not think that the Constitution gives us the right to keep and bear arms.