Yes you are. You are just too morally bankrupt to realize it.
You've just proven my point.
You don't have a point; your entire moral foundation is to get "your" candidate elected, regardless of what he actually believes. If Bill Clinton had an (R) after his name on the ballot, you would surely vote for him just as willingly.
You don't have a clue what is a violation of oath, or what is unconstitutional
Obviously I know far more than you about the subject; you can't even grasp that the words of the Constitution actually mean what they say, or that an oath to "uphold and defend" that Constitution means not trying to dismantle the concepts embodied within its words. If you are so clueless that you don't realize that the AWB violates "shall not be infringed", then you are of the same mentality as Clinton; neither of you believe words mean anything.
My point is that you have such a wharped definition what's unconstitutional that no one would be able to stay within it.
Nonsense. With a few rare exceptions, just about every president before FDR stayed within its bounds. Your morality is so degenerate that once again your only excuse for such heinous violations of the oath of office is the false claim that "everybody does it".