Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As I Predicted, George W. Bush Is Backing Bill Clinton's Gun Ban
Toogood Reports ^ | April 15, 2003 | By Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 04/14/2003 7:45:39 PM PDT by Uncle Bill

Edited on 04/17/2003 6:40:21 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

As I Predicted, George W. Bush
Is Backing Bill Clinton's Gun Ban

TooGood Reports
By Chuck Baldwin
Chuck Baldwin Website
April 15, 2003

In this column dated December 17, 2002, I predicted that President G.W. Bush would support the so-called assault weapons ban first promoted by former President Bill Clinton and Sen. Diane Feinstein back in 1994. Interestingly enough, the gun ban became law on the strength of a tie-breaking vote by then Vice President Al Gore. The ban is scheduled to sunset next year, but Bush is joining Clinton and Gore in supporting an extension.

Presidential spokesman Scott McClellan said, "The president supports the current law (the Clinton gun ban), and he supports reauthorization of the current law."

This must come as quite a blow to people such as the leaders of the National Rifle Association who campaigned heavily for Bush touting him as a "pro-gun" candidate. Since his election, the NRA and others have repeatedly reaffirmed their support for Bush, because he is "pro-gun." Well, now the mask is off!

I have tried to warn my readers that Bush is not a true conservative. He is not pro-life; he is not pro-family; he is not pro-Constitution. And now we know he is not pro-gun.

Instead of reversing the miserable policies of Clinton/Gore, Bush is helping to harden the cement around those policies. The gun issue is no exception.

The so-called assault weapons ban was the benchmark piece of legislation reflecting the anti-gun policies of people such as Clinton, Gore, Feinstein, and New York Senator Charles Schumer. It was also the number one target of the NRA. In fact, the NRA all but promised their supporters that a Bush presidency would help reverse this Draconian gun ban. Instead, Bush is pushing Congress to extend the ban.

A bill to reauthorize the gun ban will be introduced by Senator Feinstein in the coming weeks. It must pass both chambers of Congress to reach the President's desk. The best chance of stopping it will be in the House of Representatives. However, in order to defeat this bill, it must resist the power and influence of the White House. This will be no small task.

Not only is Bush betraying the pro-gun voters who helped elect him, he is breathing new life into a nearly dead anti-gun movement. Most political analysts credit Bush's pro-gun image as the chief reason he defeated Al Gore in the 2000 election. They also credit the pro-gun image of the Republican Party for helping them to achieve impressive wins in the 2002 congressional elections.

Now, Bush is giving new credibility to anti-gun zealots such as Schumer and Feinstein and is helping to reinvigorate the anti-gun momentum that had all but been put on ice.

However, the real question will be, "Will pro-gun conservatives continue to support Bush?" Bush is every bit the "Teflon President" that Clinton was. Conservatives seem willing to overlook anything he does, no matter how liberal or unconstitutional it may be. Will they overlook this, also?

If you truly believe in the Second Amendment and are willing to do something about it, I suggest you go to the Gun Owners of America website. They have a quick link set up which allows people an opportunity to conveniently send email to the White House about this issue. Go to the gun ban "alert" button. From there you can voice your disapproval with the President's decision to betray his constituents by supporting this new round of gun control.

Once again, the ball of freedom and constitutional government is in the court of the American people. Will they keep the ball and do something with it, or will they hand it off to the neo-conservatives at the White House? We'll see.


PLEASE Don't Sit out 2004, EVEN IF Bush signs the AW ban extention

Bush Supports New Extension Of Assault-Weapons Ban

Bush Backs Renewing Assault Weapons Ban



"That’s why I’m for instant background checks at gun shows. I’m for trigger locks."
George W. Bush - Source: St. Louis debate Oct 17,2000.

MORE INJUSTICE ON THE WAY - Bush GUN CONTROL
"Gene Healy, a Cato Institute scholar, recently provided a thorough exploration of the unintended consequences of one law, the new Bush-Ashcroft plan to federalize gun crimes, known as the Project Safe Neighborhoods program. The unintended consequences of this law are frightening."
NOTE: Same Article in Washington Times.

There Goes the Neighborhood: The Bush-Ashcroft Plan to "Help" Localities Fight Gun Crime, by Gene Healy

"W. Wimps Out on Guns"
The Bush package includes several pet causes of the gun-control lobby, including $75 million for gun locks; $15.3 million for 113 new federal attorneys to serve as full-time gun prosecutors; and $19.1 million to expand a program by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms aimed at preventing youths from obtaining guns. Although Bush stressed that he simply wants to "enforce existing laws," the fine print of Project Safe echoes the gun-grabbing Left's call to ban the importation of high-capacity ammunition clips."

Project Safe Neighborhoods, A Closer Look

LAURA BUSH:
"During her San Diego speech, for instance, she said nothing about the school shooting that occurred 20 miles away in El Cajon the day before, although in a television interview she condemned it, adding that she thinks more gun control laws are needed.

"I think that's very important," she said when asked by CNN whether stronger gun laws are needed."
Source.

EMERSON & THE SECOND AMENDMENT

A Gutless Supreme Court Decision - Gun Control

Republican Leadership Help Push Gun Control

Bush's Assault On Second Amendment

NEA Resource Text Guide In Regards To The Extreme Right - Where Do Your Kids Go To School?
"The radical right says it is pro-life but it bitterly opposes gun control legislation"

or

A Problem With Guns?


Thanks for that Patriot Act George


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS: assaultweaponsban; bang; banglist; bush; guns; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,041-1,0601,061-1,0801,081-1,100 ... 1,621-1,638 next last
To: dinodino
Perfect. That will get us President Hitlery. Great.
1,061 posted on 04/16/2003 6:31:54 PM PDT by diamond6 ("Everyone who is for abortion HAS been born." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1058 | View Replies]

To: diamond6
If President Hillary will trample on the Constitution, as I know she would, she won't get my vote if she's running; if Bush backs this ban and shows his willingness to trample on the Constitution, he also won't get my vote. Understand?
1,062 posted on 04/16/2003 6:34:06 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1061 | View Replies]

To: diamond6
Vote (or not) based on your personal principles, not because you're afraid of the other guy. Don't compromise your beliefs because you are afraid of some Democrat boogieman.
1,063 posted on 04/16/2003 6:35:04 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1061 | View Replies]

To: diamond6
Interesting list. Now where is the support for the Constitution that he swore to uphold and defend? I can't seem to find it in your list... And empire-building by any other name is still not in our Constitution, either.
1,064 posted on 04/16/2003 6:37:08 PM PDT by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1057 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
I suspect diamond6 is one of those "The Constitution is a musty old document written by dead white men" types. Either that, or she hasn't actually READ it.
1,065 posted on 04/16/2003 6:38:25 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1064 | View Replies]

To: dinodino
Likely so!
1,066 posted on 04/16/2003 6:40:59 PM PDT by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1065 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Besides, y'all got Ted Nugent!
Good to read posts by a real activist. Getting the job done involves more than whining in forums. It's time to prepare to get involved in those party functions, take a bunch of people, and kick ass!
1,067 posted on 04/16/2003 6:45:43 PM PDT by Nucluside (Freep Austin, May 3rd!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Hal
I am disappointed. Lets see how it plays out.

Definitely need to see how it plays out. I think the long term will tell. The bill will NEVER get out of committee.

1,068 posted on 04/16/2003 6:49:53 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: diamond6
Well, in my case, it depends on if there is a primary and who is running in that primary.
1,069 posted on 04/16/2003 6:58:48 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("I have two guns. One for each of ya." - Doc Holliday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1043 | View Replies]

To: All
BTW, what have you handwringers, whiners, defeatists, and bitches done lately in the way of political action? I've attended precinct, local, regional, and state Republican Party conventions all my teen-age and adult life and run for State House once. Except for my inability to get myself elected we pick our people, run them, and get them elected.
My conservative political involvement has cost me my livlihood, home, and, with loss of income, my personal savings, and I'm not quitting for one damned minute. I do more than talk the God, Guns, and Guts credo, I LIVE it.
If you're not going to do anything but cry then STFU!!
1,070 posted on 04/16/2003 7:00:55 PM PDT by Nucluside (Freep Austin, May 3rd!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Just a simple question, who would you rather have in the White House at the current time or even in the future

You avoided answering my question with one of your own. Is that your definition of fair debate?

This is neither a question or an answer but a simple statement of fact: It does not matter which party separates us from our rights and our money.

Regards

J.R.

1,071 posted on 04/16/2003 7:10:38 PM PDT by NMC EXP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1025 | View Replies]

To: All
The way for Republicans, at least, to get the vote out is to give conservatives a reason to vote.


Republicans must quit losing their nerve, even when defeat looks certain. By sticking to their principles instead of cowering in the face of opposition, at least they'll preserve issues for future elections. If they don't, they'll give conservatives no reason to stick with them.

If Republicans honor their commitment to freedom and the Constitution, grassroots conservatives will walk miles in the snow to support them on Election Day.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=23905

1,072 posted on 04/16/2003 7:19:39 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1070 | View Replies]

To: Nucluside
BTW, what have you handwringers, whiners, defeatists, and bitches done lately in the way of political action?

I vote in every election.

I always vote against incumbents.

I vote for any alternative to the screw party system whenever possible.

I am curious. Do you go around telling strangers to "STFU" in the meat world or is that something you do only in the world of 1's and 0's?

Regards

J.R.

1,073 posted on 04/16/2003 7:20:02 PM PDT by NMC EXP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1070 | View Replies]

To: Jed Eckert
Thanks for the link.
1,074 posted on 04/16/2003 7:28:07 PM PDT by k2blader (Pity people paralyzed in paradigms of political perfection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1033 | View Replies]

To: All

A NATION OF COWARDS


1,075 posted on 04/16/2003 8:58:53 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("I have two guns. One for each of ya." - Doc Holliday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1074 | View Replies]

To: diamond6
"Here is a partial list of conservative issues/values that Bush stands for: 1. prolife; 2. prolife ultra-conservative judges; 3. probably the biggest tax cut we've ever had; 4. war on terrorism; 5. war on Afghanistan and attempt at democracy in their country; 6. war on Iraq, regime change of Saddam, removal of chemical weapons once they're found, and democracy; 7. tough hardline stance against North Korea, who are now changing their tune, now that they see we are willing to fight; 8. hardline stance against Syria, which will probably result in the release of Iraqi leadership they are harboring; 9. a strong Christian faith and moral foundation which shapes his decisions, because he has convictions.

You see. I do have the guts to answer questions, unlike many of the blowhards in this thread, who are nothing but malcontents."
1,057 posted on 04/16/2003 6:28 PM PDT by diamond6


1. " prolife;"

BUSH SIGNS LARGEST FAMILY PLANNING BILL IN U.S. HISTORY
"On Thursday, January 10, 2002, the White House reported President Bush signed the ominous $15.4 billion foreign appropriations bill, H.R. 2506, for fiscal-year 2002. The bill authorizes $446.5 million U.S. tax dollars to be given to other countries for abortion-family planning activities throughout the world. The abortion-family planning funds approved by Bush represents an increase of $21.5 million over last year for international family planning."

The Bush administration has approved the first federally funded project using stem cells obtained from fetuses aborted up to eight weeks after conception

Bush’s Walk Doesn’t Match His Talk On Life Issue

Bush White House Killed Human-Cloning Ban

2. "prolife ultra-conservative judges;"

Bush Appoints 5 Pro-Abortion Judges

Bush’s Court Jester - "The man charged by President Bush with screening potential U.S. Supreme Court justice nominees believes the Constitution is a "living document"
Note: Scalia - "this theory of the living Constitution will destroy us, it will destroy the federal courts,"

3. "probably the biggest tax cut we've ever had"

LOL! Bush "allows" us to have a few bucks of "our money" back, then, sends us a tax bill in the mail for $30,000+ more than when he tripped into the White House, and you’re excited? And your an attorney? Scary. I’m only going to list just a few links to hundreds of documents outlining Bush’s socialist bonanza accomplishments as the entire list would take me weeks. I’m not taking the time. You’re not worth it.

Bush budget contains $10 in new spending for every dollar in tax cuts, Libertarians say

George W. Bush’s Big Government Accomplishments

"This farm bill will cost the average American taxpaying family $4,300 in higher taxes."

Blowing the Budget. Bush’s budget means more spending, more government. Roughly $20K per household

HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?
"In less than two years, President Bush has presided over more government expansion than took place during eight years of Bill Clinton."

Bush's Compassionate Conservatism Will Undermine the Republicans and Capitalism

Welfare for the Left, Welfare for the Right, Welfare for the World

A Government Limited To What?

"Not over my dead body will they raise your taxes,"
George W. Bush - SOURCE.

President George W. Bush - Biography

SOURCE: http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html

"George W. Bush is the 43rd President of the United States. Formerly the 46th Governor of the State of Texas, President Bush has earned a reputation as a compassionate conservative who shapes policy based on the principles of limited government,..."

Bush is fighting terrorism and doesn’t even know who the enemy is.

I can post more of George’s "conservatism" if you like.


Be a malcontent or a blowhard, show Bush the door in 2004

Don't Get Fooled Again - "I've been advocating voters refuse to support any candidate for office who does not acknowledge the supremacy of the U.S. Constitution" - Joseph Farah


"I believe in freedom of speech"

1,076 posted on 04/16/2003 9:05:59 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1057 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Referring to President G. W. Bush's new Department of Homeland Security, former President Bill Clinton told a gathering of Council on Foreign Relations members last week, "We have been building this for a long time." For once, Clinton told the truth.

Bush continues Clinton agenda

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28061


1,077 posted on 04/16/2003 9:16:35 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1015 | View Replies]

To: All
Rational Basis Analysis of "Assault Weapon" Prohibition
1,078 posted on 04/16/2003 9:34:23 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("I have two guns. One for each of ya." - Doc Holliday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1077 | View Replies]

To: diamond6
You're right. President Bush is a man of character.

Not if he signs the renewal to this so-called law he isn't. People who break oaths aren't men of character, and there simply is no oath in our system of government greater than that of the Presidency. Since part of that oath is a promise to uphold and defend the Constitution, his signing of the bill would be a violation of that oath.

1,079 posted on 04/16/2003 10:02:06 PM PDT by Technogeeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1011 | View Replies]

To: Technogeeb
"People who break oaths aren't men of character, and there simply is no oath in our system of government greater than that of the Presidency. Since part of that oath is a promise to uphold and defend the Constitution, his signing of the bill would be a violation of that oath."


Character Matters

1,080 posted on 04/16/2003 10:07:53 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1079 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,041-1,0601,061-1,0801,081-1,100 ... 1,621-1,638 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson