Skip to comments.
An un-American conservative
Jerusalem Post ^
| Apr. 13, 2003
| IRVING LOUIS HOROWITZ
Posted on 04/14/2003 12:36:11 PM PDT by yonif
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
1
posted on
04/14/2003 12:36:11 PM PDT
by
yonif
To: yonif
I simply don't listen to Buchanan anymore.
2
posted on
04/14/2003 12:37:42 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: All
Raise Your Hand If You Want To Donate To Free Republic!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
04/14/2003 12:39:59 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: yonif
4
posted on
04/14/2003 12:41:43 PM PDT
by
dighton
(Amen-Corner Hatchet Team, Nasty Little Clique)
To: yonif
I failed to read this rant thinking it was about Buchanan! If facism comes to America? This is nuts!
5
posted on
04/14/2003 12:42:32 PM PDT
by
MEG33
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: hchutch; Poohbah
.
7
posted on
04/14/2003 12:49:31 PM PDT
by
Chancellor Palpatine
(running and hiding behind the 21st Century version of the Maginot Line is not an option)
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Buchanan is, as of now, an irrelevant troll.
He needs to launch a Putsch against the current President to become the darling of the media.
8
posted on
04/14/2003 12:51:34 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: Poohbah; Luis Gonzalez
Either that or to continue with his drivel.
The man is sure acting like an anti-Semite.
9
posted on
04/14/2003 1:04:55 PM PDT
by
hchutch
(America came, America saw, America liberated; as for those who hate us, Oderint dum Metuant)
To: yonif
Ho hum! Folks like Pat Buchanan and Joe Sobran have become irrelevant among conservative thinkers in America. Truly wise men don't see conspiracies (Jewish or otherwise) every time America's interests are at stake; it is intellectually lazy (and dishonest) to do so.
10
posted on
04/14/2003 1:05:45 PM PDT
by
Ebenezer
(Proud member of Israel's "Amen Corner")
To: MEG33
Typical screed from a man who has no argument. Anytime anyone disagres with him call him "un-American." Pretty slimy.
To: MEG33
Another reason to think liberals are insane. When Pat Buchanan was part of the Republican party, the Republican party was the "extreme right-wingnuts party" because of him. When Buchanan leaves what happens? They love Pat (because he hates Bush) and somehow think Republicans have become even more right-wing. Where's the logic in that?
12
posted on
04/14/2003 1:16:28 PM PDT
by
techcor
To: techcor
I never claim to be qualified to study the mentally disabled.
13
posted on
04/14/2003 1:19:52 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: yonif
Justin Raimondo quoted in an article? I clicked my browser back button right there.
To: yonif
Buchanan's biggest problem is that he understands the Constitution better than most neo-cons (is that short for the "new con job"?) and in the face of opposition that contains heavy doses of ignorance and arrogance he continues to persevere.
To: american spirit
It seems that the poster's intention was to discredit Buchanan. He failed. The article was about conservativism. Buchanan remains the most apolitical conservative figure in the media.
To: yonif
At the forefront of what might be called the post-Russell Kirk wing of traditional conservatism is Patrick J. Buchanan, The author is under a mistaken impression if he thinks that PJB is at the forefront of anything. The number of Pat's followers is well within the statistical margin of error from zero. He is not a leader of any appreciable number of conservatives, neo or paleo.
17
posted on
04/14/2003 1:30:10 PM PDT
by
Hugin
To: rrstar96
I agree but I would add that it's just as lazy to sit around thinking that everything just happens by accident and there are no hidden agendas among politicians or the wealthy.
To: yonif
Much ado about nothing. Buchanan is completely irrelevant. Even this article gives his current prospects for political influence far too much credence.
To: american spirit
Buchanan's biggest problem is that he understands the Constitution better than most neo-consI'd be interested in seeing some examples to illustrate this assertion.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson