[Rate_Determining_Step]

>> It is entirely acceptable and non-contradictary to be a mystical, anti-reason, altruistic, collectivist dope smoker and still be a Libertarian.

>> Not if the non-aggression principle (the cornerstone of libertarian political advocacy) is followed to it's logical conclusion.

OK, pull "collectivist" and I'm accurate.

You entirely bypass my point that Libertarianism is a >political party<. NOT a philosophy. Not even close.

[OWK]

You entirely bypass my point that Libertarianism is a >political party<. NOT a philosophy. Not even close.

It is a political party which is supposed to be predicated on the non-aggression principle.