[BenLurkin]

Tail Gunner Joe says: "We who want to remove these threats from women are not haters of women, we are lovers of women. Those who are expressing hostility toward women are the ones who are happy that they were ordered into harms way, raped and murdered."

Do you A) Agree and if so B) State your reasons why.

Joe has framed the issues into a clear point of discussion. This is a forum for discussion FRiends. Let's not shout at each other, for then no one learns anything.

[Blue Collar Christian]

The thread I was reading, and the remarks I directed toward you were discussing the author's commentary, not TGJ's opinion.

For the most part, I agree with TGJ's opinion, but I fail to recognize where the author wrote of "Those who are expressing hostility toward women are the ones who are happy that they were ordered into harms way, raped and murdered.", so I haven't chosen to contribute to the thread my thoughts, pro or con, on that statement.

What I have contributed to this thread is certainly clear enough. I am not surprised that you can't put your finger on it.

[William Terrell]

Are you in favor of putting women in combat? You seem to be saying you're tied up with psychological innuendo you see in the article, yet with odd side comments carefully phrased. Why don't you just declare your position, take an honest stand and see how you do?

[b-cubed]

Tail Gunner Joe says: "We who want to remove these threats from women are not haters of women, we are lovers of women. Those who are expressing hostility toward women are the ones who are happy that they were ordered into harms way, raped and murdered."

Do you A) Agree and if so B) State your reasons why.

A) I agree. B) I cain't help it. I guess i'uz jest created that way.