Yes, and we were much better off. Without Clinton, we would never have had a Republican House or Senate. Had Clinton been elected in 1988, we probably wouldn't have had the ADA or some other monstrosity--and we wouldn't have had Waco--remember, that was a Bush operation, planned in October 1992.
RINOs, as George I was, in concert with a liberal Congress, are much more dangerous than up-front liberals.
But it doesn't really matter. As I said above, this sort of crap will make the whiners of "he's better than [blank]" irrelevant.