Skip to comments.
Suspected chemical warhead found in Kirkuk
cnn ^
| 4/12/03
| Thomas Nybo
Posted on 04/12/2003 10:02:42 AM PDT by knak
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:02:23 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Here we go again.
1
posted on
04/12/2003 10:02:42 AM PDT
by
knak
To: All
SHOW YOUR PRIDE! SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
04/12/2003 10:04:35 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: knak
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was written in accordance with Pentagon ground rules allowing so-called embedded reporting, in which journalists join deployed troops. Among the rules accepted by all participating news organizations is an agreement not to disclose sensitive operational details. Thomas Nybo is accompanying U.S. troops with the 173 Airborne Brigade.How long has the Complicity News Network been including this snotty disclaimer on this pieces?
3
posted on
04/12/2003 10:08:13 AM PDT
by
Timesink
To: knak
and it starts all over again.
yawn
4
posted on
04/12/2003 10:10:12 AM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(God Reigns!)
To: Timesink
I noticed that. Gee, did they have disclaimers about restrictions on their reports from Iraq? Hmmmm?
To: Timesink
How long has the Complicity News Network been including this snotty disclaimer on this pieces?Don't know, but they never included a disclaimer like this when reporting out of Iraq under the influence of minders.
6
posted on
04/12/2003 10:13:30 AM PDT
by
SirAllen
To: knak
We must beware of anything that CNN puts out about WMD finds!
7
posted on
04/12/2003 10:15:13 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
To: knak
We've seen this picture a couple of places now.
And does anyone remember that gray mettalic tank thingie from a week or so ago, which also looked suspicious? Maybe that picture could be located as well.
My point is:
Maybe there's some military people here who could give some opinions.
And what about these field tests? I would like just one reporter to find out whether these field tests can distinguish between, say, Sarin vs. an insecticide, or, as another example, Plutonium vs. depleted uranium waste.
Why don't any reporters ever ask these information-producing questions?
8
posted on
04/12/2003 10:21:29 AM PDT
by
sargon
To: knak
more smoke from the smoldering gun...I believe it. He's right about the pictures...they're busted for sure. Now we have to find the big containers and drums full of bio.
9
posted on
04/12/2003 10:22:59 AM PDT
by
Shaka
To: Grampa Dave
"We must beware of anything that CNN puts out about WMD finds!"Grampa Dave, after the relevations we heard yesterday (framed so well by Rush on his program opener), we must beware of anything CNN puts out about everything--not just WMD finds!
Oh, how I hate the seemingly endless supply of evil minions attached to the Clintons. The Clintons placed the world in grave danger with all they accomplished. I will never forgive them for that.
To: knak
Oh well, according to CNN, any of these finds are nothing more than pesticides. So, move on, nothing to see here </sarcasm> off
To: Husker8877
Excellent point. We must not trust nor believe the Whore$ at the Clinton Noodle Net on any story they come up with.
12
posted on
04/12/2003 10:30:31 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
To: knak
It's not a warhead, this is just how Iraqis can their
pesticides...
To: knak
14
posted on
04/12/2003 10:35:02 AM PDT
by
fuzzy122
To: el_texicano
Yes, I do believe that is a Mark V al-Canof Ra'id pesticide warhead. Standard issue in the Middle East; primarily used for eradication of swarming hordes of locusts. Or infidels.
/sarcasm
15
posted on
04/12/2003 10:37:48 AM PDT
by
gbunch
(God bless our President and our troops.)
To: knak
"EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was written in accordance with Pentagon ground rules allowing so-called embedded reporting...."CNN getting a little defensive all of a sudden?? But what's this little disclaimer have to do with CNN having specific knowledge of ongoing atrocities in Saddam's regime, for YEARS, while keeping quiet about it and then dissing the administration for doing something about it???
16
posted on
04/12/2003 10:38:30 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions= Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Timesink
They've had a disclaimer from the beginning, but it's grown since then (kinda Pinnochio-like)
17
posted on
04/12/2003 10:38:55 AM PDT
by
Bilbo
To: Sabertooth
Seems like a really harsh way to apply pesticides. Me'thinks it might really tear up the tomatoes to have one of those land in the patch.
18
posted on
04/12/2003 10:39:17 AM PDT
by
Sweetpkl
To: Timesink
"Complicity News Network"Good one!
19
posted on
04/12/2003 10:39:35 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions= Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: gbunch
primarily used for eradication of ... infidels.Heck, the only people the Iraqis have ever used chem weapons on are Kurds and Iranians, who are all Muslims.
Maybe you ought to check your assumptions.
20
posted on
04/12/2003 10:42:36 AM PDT
by
Illbay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson