Well gee, domestically Bush has a strong house but a mushy middle Senate. You want him to act like a dictator.
Like I said in 99, Feinstein and Schumer pushed through a draconian gun bill through the Senate at the height of Clinton's popularity, it died in the House, the same will probably will happen here.
Like I said, why don't you study up on the present political realities instead of flagellating yoursel over being "betrayed".
Vetoing a single, unCOnstiututional bill is NOT acting like a dictator... it's in his job description, Dane!
Like I said in 99, Feinstein and Schumer pushed through a draconian gun bill through the Senate at the height of Clinton's popularity, it died in the House, the same will probably will happen here.
Let's hope so... but once again, that was what we said about CFR, and we got stabbed in the back there, too. The problem is that he is promising to do it to us... again!
Like I said, why don't you study up on the present political realities instead of flagellating yoursel over being "betrayed".
Well, you're right, it isn't betrayal when he keeps his (ill-advised and short-sighted) promise. He's betraying his oath of office, not his campaign promises. Oddly enough, you apparently think that this is the better choice, because political posturing is more important to you than Constitutional principles. Happily, I feel that the opposite is true... and I'm very glad that you are on the other side of this issue. That's usually a good sign.