Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alwaysconservative
I thought about making that point (an "escape clause" for GWB, if you will), but since he isn't electing to use it (the article was about is re-affirming his intent to sign it), it's mostly a moot point.
505 posted on 04/12/2003 7:29:32 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317
Sorry, I just don't buy the timing or agenda of the article (wasn't the WP the one that encouraged the fiction that most of President Bush's father's generals were trying to get a "message" to him about the war?), or that the President, who has made no stupid political decisions yet, decided in the midst of his march to victory, that he would toss away a staunch base of support without a very valid reason? It just doesn't fit that a man who is willing to ignore the hysterics of the left on the march to war would throw away the support he has generated by winning those wars. I repeat: if you feel strongly about this, email the White House at president@whitehouse.gov and let him know how you feel.
513 posted on 04/12/2003 7:41:56 PM PDT by alwaysconservative ("All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson