I'm just interested in why there was a ban in the first place, and two, why do you need to:
say such things?
follow that religion?
print such news?
assemble publicly in such groups?
have the same rights as whites?
keep the fruits of your own labor?
have women voting?
Get the point? None other than uber-liberal Alan Dershowitz said that allowing gun bans was a bad idea because it sets a road map for other rights to be attacked.
As I have said on other occasions, my whole problem with any anti-gun law is that they are trying to put a band aid on a gapping wound- and that wound isn't the second amendment. It's the behavior and rationale that causes a person to pick up a gun and purposely kill (as I understand the soccer moms think guns are used for). All the gun laws in the world will not change that behavior, that need to murder. Take away a gun, and that person will just find something else to satisfy their need to kill.
Hell, if they ban assault rifles, then why not ban ritalin. It's done just as much 'so-called' harm.