Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rintense
See? That's my point. Even if someone had a supposely legitimate reason to ban some group of firearms that are especially dangerous, the AW ban does not do that. Instead, it bans certain firearms based on primarily cosmetic bases. It is bad law, and is a typical liberal law, as it doesn't actually accomplish anything, but it allows liberals to "show they care" by passing a symbolic law.
427 posted on 04/12/2003 5:13:54 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts
With all due respect (and I offer due respect), it does accomplish something. It accomplishes the show of precedent that the the feds can ban anything, in all the fifty states (for example a particular class of -x- (guns, drugs, etc.) for reasons as irrelevant as the way they look). For any reason they want.

And that many of the American people will swallow it whole. Present company excepted, of course.

564 posted on 04/12/2003 10:02:31 PM PDT by lainie (This message powered by calming loud music.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson