Replies

Therefore, we should vote for him. Gotta love circular logic.

Yep that circular logic of those who don't get a 100% fresh baked loaf of bread, with a card with smooches all over it, go to the next bakery where they readily accept and buy a moldy rancid loaf of bread the democratic party has to offer.

First of all, look up the definition of circular logic. It doesn't apply to the situation you described.

Secondly, only one person on this thread has said that he would support Democrats in retaliation for this, and I agree that would be foolish. No one else has advocated that.

"Yep that circular logic of those who don't get a 100% fresh baked loaf of bread, with a card with smooches all over it, go to the next bakery where they readily accept and buy a moldy rancid loaf of bread the democratic party has to offer."

Bad analogy. Bread serves to improve and sustain one's health. What improves and sustains one's liberty? Firearms rights.

So since both parties are happy to worsen the health of my liberty, they are each offering me loaves of bread laced with different amounts of poison. One loaf has a slight amount that can't be tasted, and which goes down easy. Over time, if I eat enough, I (my liberties) may die. The other (offered by the Democrat baker) has much more poison, tastes bitter. May people will try to tell me how much better it is to live longer, and enjoy the delicious taste of the second baker's bread (like feeling good about having someone with moral character in the White House!) They will tell me that I shouldn't try to put the "better" baker out of business, because the alternatives are so limited.

In either event, I find a third source of sustenance, because at the very least, even if I risk starving to death, I don't wish to help either poisonous baker, and odds are that one of the bakers will realize that he will prosper more by getting rid of the poison.