Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lainie
AND some people here don't seem to understand that the thing will sunset unless it's renewed. It's not new legislation.

I guess they didn't read the first paragraph of the (Wash Post) article posted: "The President supports the current law, and he supports reauthorization of the current law."

Let's just hope the renewal never reaches Bush's desk. ...but we'll have to work hard toward that end.

238 posted on 04/12/2003 11:19:05 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Mojo
We send people to Congress to uphold the Constitution. Why do we need to keep reminding them of their oath?
242 posted on 04/12/2003 11:21:37 AM PDT by chnsmok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
I guess they didn't read the first paragraph of the (Wash Post) article posted: "The President supports the current law, and he supports reauthorization of the current law."

There is a trap in all this that waits to be srung. If Bush announced at this time he was against the current law, all hell would breal lose by accusations that his administration wasn't supporting the current laws.

281 posted on 04/12/2003 12:22:29 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson