Oh, Oh, the word has been spoken by someone who has never won an election and refuses to admit that political warfare is a component in modern America.
not his campaign promises. Oddly enough, you apparently think that this is the better choice, because political posturing is more important to you than Constitutional principles. Happily, I feel that the opposite is true... and I'm very glad that you are on the other side of this issue. That's usually a good sign
You keep on with your self flagellation, I guess it makes you feel important to bad mouth a President who is 1000 times better than Gore.
You also are a hopeless malcontent, IMO.
ROFL! I love it when you use the tactics of the Left. Attack the speaker rather than the thought. Once again, you revel in the methods of the Left, while insisting that you are on the Right. Too funny. Try addressing the point that he sworn an oath to prevent unConstitutional bills from passing his desk (aka "upholding the Constitution of the United States").
You keep on with your self flagellation,
You keep using dat word. I do not think it means what you think it means. /Inigo Montoya from the Princess Bride>
I guess it makes you feel important to bad mouth a President who is 1000 times better than Gore.
Ah, but once again, let us use your own analysis here. If he is 1000 times better than Gore based on principle alone, yet the political reality is that the country domestically gets virtually the same exact results, then what is the point of worrying about the principles? (This mirrors your argument that the political realities of bill-signing prevent you from worrying about the principled arguments on the Constitution: Pragmatism over Principle. So using your logic, I do not have to worry about not voting for GWB in the primaries or the general election!)