Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quick trial, firing squad for three men provoke fury
The Miami Herald ^ | 4/12/2003 | ALFONSO CHARDY

Posted on 04/12/2003 6:35:34 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez

Three men who hijacked a passenger ferry and attempted to steer it to Florida last week were executed by firing squad at dawn Friday after summary trials, infuriating the U.S. government, international human rights organizations and Cuban Americans in Miami.

The men were charged with ''very grave acts of terrorism'' and sentenced at trials Tuesday, according to an official statement read on Cuban state television. The men appealed -- but the sentences were swiftly upheld by Cuba's Supreme Tribunal and ruling Council of State and carried out shortly thereafter, the statement said.

No one was hurt in the hijacking, ultimately foiled by the Cuban authorities, for which the three men were executed.

The three were identified as Lorenzo Enrique Copello Castillo, Bárbaro Leodán Sevilla García and Jorge Luis Martínez Isaac. In Miami, Yordani Montoya, 27, half sister of Martínez Isaac, blasted the Castro regime.

''This was an injustice,'' she said. `No one was killed or injured in the hijacking. If he had gotten a prison term, that would have been OK. . . . From Fidel Castro, you can expect anything.''

In Havana, police reportedly were sent to cordon off the neighborhood where Sevilla García's mother lives, after witnesses said some neighbors went into the streets crying and shouting against the government.

Though more than a dozen people have been executed in Cuba since 1994, Friday's executions were the first of Cubans charged with terrorism-related offenses in more than a decade. An exile from Miami, Eduardo Díaz Betancourt, was executed in January 1992 after being found guilty of terrorism, sabotage and enemy propaganda following his arrest while on a mission to infiltrate Cuba.

''These were almost certainly cases in which the defendants were not given due process and, given that Cuba hadn't carried out death sentences in two years, a highlydisturbing development,'' read a statement issued by the U.S. branch of Amnesty International.

Friday's executions came as a shock, but seemed part of a deliberate hardening of Cuban government attitudes against any act of political dissent. They were the capstone to weeks of heightened political tension on the island, highlighted by scores of arrests of dissidents, stiff sentences against some of those opponents and a string of successful and attempted hijackings.

Seventy-five dissidents were sentenced this week to terms ranging from six to 28 years on charges of receiving money from, and collaborating with, U.S. officials to undermine the Cuban government.

Senior Cuban officials have said the crackdown was necessary to protect national security against opponents bent on undermining the island's communist system at the behest of the United States.

Cuba's Catholic bishops issued a statement deploring the executions and the crackdown on dissidents. ''No one has the right to put in danger the lives of other people, like the hijackers did, but in the same manner, no one can decide that death must be inflicted on others as a remedy,'' the statement said in part.

The Bush administration reacted quickly, calling the executions a reflection of totalitarianism.

''We are concerned that these executions may have been a result of summary proceedings,'' said Lou Fintor, a State Department spokesman. ``Summary proceedings are a hallmark of totalitarian dictatorships like Cuba. Due process allows an appropiate judicial process to carefully identify and punish serious crimes like hijacking and guard against manufactured charges based on political agendas as was done with the opposition groups.''

South Florida's Cuban-American Republicans in Congress also condemned the executions.

''They were sentenced in kangaroo courts, tried for trying to flee Cuba and within hours shot to death,'' said Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.

''Castro's oppression constitutes a form of terrorism that cannot continue to be allowed to exist by the international community,'' said Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart.

In Miami, Cuban exile leaders were furious. Joe Garcia, executive director of the Cuban American National Foundation, summed up the sentiment: ''They have murdered these poor people,'' he said. ``The summary trial and an execution without due process is murder, and the U.S government should indict Fidel Castro and his brother Raúl Castro and all the other thugs that govern that island.''

In Key West, a U.S. Coast Guard spokesman said the service was on alert for any unusual activity in the Florida Straits arising from the executions. In times of tension in Cuba, South Florida officials worry about uncontrollable refugee boatlifts.

Criticism also came from a few other countries -- but, by and large, foreign governments were silent. For example, Spanish Vice President Mariano Rajoy said the executions prove Castro ''is a tyrant,'' but Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez -- a Castro friend -- refused comment, saying he did not wish to interfere in Cuban affairs.

Some Cuban experts said the executions and the dissident crackdown marked the start of a period of harshness in the island.

Jaime Suchlicki, director of the Institute for Cuba and Cuban American Studies at the University of Miami, said Castro is trying to eliminate the opposition to solidify the Cuban Communist Party before retiring.

''The crackdown has to do with a plan by Castro of ending the opposition to pave the way for his brother and succession in Cuba,'' Suchlicki said.

Castro has repeatedly said his brother Raúl, the defense minister, will be his successor.

Besides those executed, another four men received life sentences: Maikel Delgado Aramburo, Yoanny Thomas González, Harold Alcalá Aramburo and Ramón Henry Grillo.

Also sentenced in the same case were Wilmer Ledea Pérez, who received a 30-year term; Ana Rosa Ledea Ríos, five years; Yolanda Pando Rizo, three years; and Dania Rojas Gongora, two years.

The group, reportedly armed with at least one pistol and several knives, seized the Baragua and its 50 passengers in Havana Bay April 2 and ordered the captain to sail north toward Florida.

Later that day, the 45-foot ferry ran out of fuel in the Florida Straits. Officers on two Cuban Coast Guard patrol boats that chased the boat tried to persuade the hijackers to return to the island.

The hijackers allegedly threatened to throw passengers from the boxy, flat-bottomed boat overboard but soon agreed to let the ferry be towed 30 miles back to Cuba's Mariel port for refueling.

After the boat docked April 3 in Mariel, west of Havana, Cuban authorities gained control of the ferry and arrested the suspects. The arrests came after a French woman hostage jumped into the water to confuse her captors.

The standoff ended with all the hostages, then the suspects, jumping into the water.

The Baragua was hijacked a day after a Cuban passenger plane was hijacked to Key West by a man who allegedly threatened to blow up the aircraft with two grenades. The grenades turned out to be fake.

Another Cuban plane was hijacked to Key West less than two weeks earlier.

Cuba blames the hijackings on what it says is a lax attitude by American authorities toward Cuban hijackers who reach American shores.

Hijackers who reached U.S. soil are now in U.S. custody, and U.S. officials deny they are being treated leniently.

U.S. Attorney Marcos Jiménez in Miami has said Castro is ''wrong'' to say his office will treat the seven charged hijackers as ''heroes,'' noting they could face at least 20 years in prison for forcing the planes to Key West.

Yet, U.S. District Judge James Lawrence King on Thursday agreed with a Key West magistrate that six of the hijackers could be released on bail because they pose no danger to the community or risk of flight.

Immigration officials, however, say that even if the defendants are ordered released on bail, they would still remain in detention because of immigration violations.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: castro; cuba; execution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-251 next last
To: Burr5
The arrests came after a French woman hostage jumped into the water to confuse her captors.

Well, obviously, not everyone wanted to come to America. What a surprise that some frog female cost these guys their lives.

41 posted on 04/12/2003 7:26:06 AM PDT by old3030
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I hope the 'unpleasantness' didn't interfere with Yoko Ono's Mystical Havana Tour for her lefty friends. I'm sure if they had heard the shots they would have encouraged Fidel to sue the gun manufacturers.

But hey, Cuba has universal health care.

< /sarcasm >
42 posted on 04/12/2003 7:26:58 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Those guys weren't terrorists.

They were accused of being terrorists and convicted in an official, if irregular, court. I agree that doesn't make them terrorists but I don't see how we can say so and then treat 'our' terrorists in broadly the same way.

Well, I do but I don't have to admire it.

43 posted on 04/12/2003 7:31:27 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: republicofdavis
So in answer to your question, if I wanted to leave to Canada

What a useless UN we have. International law is a joke. Any country that has people dying trying to escape is committing serious human rights abuses ----and the UN sits there doing nothing.

44 posted on 04/12/2003 7:31:37 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: republicofdavis
I hear where you're coming from, and understand your frustration with the glacial speed of American executions of murderers. I agree with you on that.
45 posted on 04/12/2003 7:32:05 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Grut
Your argument is rather confusing. I don't see much connection at all between the actions of the US and the actions of Cuba.

I think Castro has successfully used words to create that impression.
46 posted on 04/12/2003 7:34:32 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Thank you. I have learned my lesson and will not quickly post off the cuff remarks in the future (unless it's something funny about Tom Daschle)
47 posted on 04/12/2003 7:34:33 AM PDT by republicofdavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: republicofdavis
LOL...It's always open season on Tom Daschle on FR.
48 posted on 04/12/2003 7:35:29 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
The left will issue apologies for any old iron-fisted left-wing dictator, as long as they are leftist. Very few of them have the consistency to protest dictators in Communist countries such as China.
49 posted on 04/12/2003 7:36:54 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: republicofdavis
LOL!

50 posted on 04/12/2003 7:43:26 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Help me decide: Is the Left morally corrupt and intellectually bankrupt, or vice versa?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
The most notorious, arbitrary, and efficient mass executioners in all of human history were or are all leftist/socialist, e.g., Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc.

Leftists tend to be be opposed to capital punishment only when they themselves do not control the machinery of government. Once they seize or assume authoritarian control of government, mass arbitrary and often secret executions become the rule--not the exception.

51 posted on 04/12/2003 7:45:14 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: freepersup
Quoting a Roger Hernandez column..

One has to marvel at the silence from the Robert Redfords, Danny Glovers, Ed Asners, Naomi Campbells, Oliver Stones, Steven Speilbergs, and other Hollywood luminaries who have made the mandatory Havana pilgrimage to speak wonders of the Cuban dictator. Do they think it's OK for Cubans to go to jail for writing and reading, as long as they keep making cool music and great cigars?

Sorry, no link to the column, read it in my local paper. It pretty much says it all right there.

52 posted on 04/12/2003 8:05:39 AM PDT by toolbreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: republicofdavis
"If an American of Palestinian descent hijacked an airliner to return to Palestine I would suggest he suffer the ultimate punishment."

An American of Palestinian descent could just simply buy an airline ticket and leave the US. Cubans are not allowed to do that.

53 posted on 04/12/2003 8:08:38 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
You are correct. So just to make sure I understand, in your opinion, a Cuban, because he is not free to leave, can commit any crime to escape, including kidnapping (murder?) and should not suffer consequences should his escape attempt fail?
54 posted on 04/12/2003 8:27:57 AM PDT by republicofdavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: republicofdavis
There was no kidnapping, some people where merely inconvenienced, but would have been immediately allowed to return upon arrival in the US.

Murder?

Yes, I can justify killing anyone who decides that they have the right to remove my right as a free man to leave this or any country, because I call THAT kidnapping, with me being the victim.

Now, under what circumstance would you grant the US government the power to take from you your ability to freely leave the country?

55 posted on 04/12/2003 8:35:39 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: republicofdavis
Great job--hang in there. You got your post up ahead of me, but I agree with you totally. These thugs hijacked a ferry and put lives in danger. I'm not a Castro fan by any stretch of the imagination, but swift justice--yes this is absolutely JUSTICE--is the only way to deal with this kind of activity. There was no doubt who the perps were and they were dealt with properly. Their right to a speedy trial was upheld and the right (even if unpopular in some arenas) decisions were made.

I can't believe I'm sitting here reading from Freepers crying over not doing something "politically correct". My G-d, Freepers sounding like liberals--"it's Cuban society thats to blame, not the fault of these poor hijackers"--what can you people be thinking of???? The first rule of freedom is you MUST accept the consequences of your actions. If you feel you must break international law (hijacking is a crime in case some of you have forgotten--and not a victimless crime either) in order to escape some social injustice, that's your right--but don't blame anyone but yourself if YOU get caught and have to pay the Piper. Florida is proof that you can get from Cuba to the USA without hijacking a ferry. Using your Freedom of choice to make really bad decisions can--and should--result in really bad consequences. This was obviously NOT a kangaroo court because if it were they would have shot them all (and been fully justified in the decision IMHO). Apparently someone in charge decided there were degrees of culpability involved, and some form of justice in this case was metered out. That's a much better sytem than we have seen at work in this country in a long time. Grow up--if you are going to shout freedom from the rooftops, you better be ready to acknowledge that screwing up in the use of that freedom can be dangerous to your health. The evil that exists in our world must be dealt with and dealt with swiftly and completely. You do bad, you pay for it--you do real bad, you pay for it big time!








































56 posted on 04/12/2003 8:40:38 AM PDT by RyeWhiskeyJoe (Illegitimi non carborundum (don't let the little bas___ds wear you down))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I guess we'll have to disagree on mere inconvenience. I assume that there was at least a threat of some hostilities and in such situations there is always the possibility of harm. You discount that as being inconsequential because the hijackers had the absolute, unfettered right to escape.

I would never grant my government the right to limit my ability to travel. Apparently the Cuban people have acquiesced through their inaction to limits on their freedom.
57 posted on 04/12/2003 8:53:50 AM PDT by republicofdavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: republicofdavis
"Apparently the Cuban people Iraqis have acquiesced through their inaction to limits on their freedom."

"Apparently the Cuban people Jews in Nazi Germany have acquiesced through their inaction to limits on their freedom."

"Apparently the Cuban people Cambodian people have acquiesced through their inaction to limits on their freedom (imposed by Pol Pot)."

Do these work for you as well?

58 posted on 04/12/2003 8:58:12 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: RyeWhiskeyJoe
Would you say that the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto deserved to be killed for rebelling against "legitimate" authority?

BTW - what is the purpose of all the white space in your post?

59 posted on 04/12/2003 9:03:03 AM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Why are you even wasting your time with these two....people?
60 posted on 04/12/2003 9:07:37 AM PDT by safeasthebanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-251 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson