On the Reliability of the Old Testament by Kitchen, K. A.
ISBN 0-8028-4960-1
Please spend a few nights reading it and then form your own conclusion about Exodus et al.
Fifteen Frequently Asked QuestionsKitchen also claimed that his case regarding the relationship between dynasties 21 and 22 was "backed by other evidence (the Neseramun family tree, etc)". What the Neseramun genealogy says is actually rather surprising. The family trees of Egyptian officials often mention under which Pharaoh a given individual held office. In this case the Neseramun genealogy specifically states that Siamun was the contemporary of two individuals. If Kitchen is right, one would expect from the rest of the genealogy that these individuals lived before the end of the 21st Dynasty. As it happens they did not. In genealogical terms they lived one to two generations after Shoshenq I, founder of the 22nd Dynasty. At a conference on Mediterranean chronology in 1995 we presented the evidence from the Neseramun and other genealogies that Siamun must have been a contemporary of the early 21st Dynasty (James et al. 1998, 32-4). The evidence from the Neseramun family tree thus shows completely the opposite of what Kitchen claimed.
Q5: Has Professor Kenneth Kitchen shown
that the CoD restructuring of
Egyptian chronology is impossible?
by Peter James and Robert Morkot
On the Reliability of the Old Testament
by Kenneth A. Kitchen