Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Politeness Guidelines Spark Hate Mail
Reuters ^ | 4/11/03 | Reuters

Posted on 04/11/2003 11:22:58 AM PDT by honeygrl

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A California city councilwoman who sought to encourage civility in public discourse by calling for an end to offensive body language said on Thursday that she has received piles of hate mail. "I've been receiving hate mail from all over the world," said Palo Alto Councilwoman Judy Kleinberg, who headed the committee that drafted the rules encouraging more politeness. "I've been called a Nazi."

"I've been told I need to be in a straight jacket with a bag over my head."

The city council in the Silicon Valley town was hoping to improve civility in the town's political debates and make it less intimidating for the public to address the group.

"Do not use body language or other nonverbal methods of expression, disagreement or disgust," one of the proposed conduct rules reads.

"People feel we were treading on the First Amendment and we aren't," Kleinberg said in an interview. "There is no ban, we are not outlawing any expression."

"We were considering a way to promote more open and free debate by discouraging, and that's a pretty important word, discouraging, not prohibiting, intimidating body expressions."

After all the publicity about the rules, the councilwoman said the measure is unlikely to pass and said she herself may vote against it.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: missmanners; nazi; polite; sanfrancisco; tyranny
I found this entertaining. I especially liked:

"After all the publicity about the rules, the councilwoman said the measure is unlikely to pass and said she herself may vote against it."

1 posted on 04/11/2003 11:22:58 AM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
discouraging, not prohibiting

So what's the point? How useless can a governing body be? [rhetorical question ;)]

2 posted on 04/11/2003 11:25:00 AM PDT by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hi mom!
3 posted on 04/11/2003 11:26:11 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
"I've been told I need to be in a straight jacket with a bag over my head."

She should form a comedy team with Baghdad Bob. This could be part of the routine.

4 posted on 04/11/2003 11:28:41 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
She refers to her "guidelines" as a "measure". Sounds like she was trying to get her "guidelines" passed as law.

Just what were these guidelines. I suspect it was content and trying to legalize it that got her hate mail.
5 posted on 04/11/2003 11:30:19 AM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl

Meet Your Mayor & City Council

Judy Kleinberg JUDY KLEINBERG
250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA
Phone No: (650) 328-8212 (o)
E-mail: judy_kleinberg@city.palo-alto.ca.us


PERSONAL
Birthplace: Hartford, Connecticut
Raised: Providence, Rhode Island
Palo Alto resident since 1984

OCCUPATION
Attorney at Law

EDUCATION
BA, University of Michigan; JD, Boalt Hall, University of California, Berkeley

6 posted on 04/11/2003 11:38:47 AM PDT by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
A California city councilwoman who sought to encourage civility in public discourse by calling for an end to offensive body language [...]
The city council [...] was hoping to [...] make it less intimidating for the public to address the group.

Do I understand this right?
Apparently it was the council members who were using the "offensive body language"...

7 posted on 04/11/2003 11:40:56 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
I've been told I need to be in a straight jacket with a bag over my head.

That would certainly insure that she didn't break her own rule.

8 posted on 04/11/2003 11:41:20 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
bump.....thanks for the post.
9 posted on 04/11/2003 11:41:36 AM PDT by Lady Eileen (The rights of the people come from God. The powers of government come from the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
"I've been receiving hate mail from all over the world," said Palo Alto Councilwoman Judy Kleinberg, who headed the committee that drafted the rules encouraging more politeness. "I've been called a Nazi."

Hey, you're in the center of the cereal bowl, surrounded by fruits, flakes and nuts. You people threw away the rules and guidelines for civility years ago. Don't be surprised when your children revolt against having to live within your "guidelines". You reap what you sow.

10 posted on 04/11/2003 11:44:22 AM PDT by Semper Vigilantis (Powell in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
She's kinds cute. Maybe just a bit of tape over the mouth.
11 posted on 04/11/2003 11:44:56 AM PDT by moyden2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
If you read the fine print, you'll find that there are penalties for violations only if committed by white folks. Any fairy, black, homeless person or illegal alien violating this ordinance "shall not be considered to have violated..." No worries.
12 posted on 04/11/2003 11:44:59 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
LOL!!! Poor lady. I feel so sorry for her. After all, she was just trying to introduce a feel-good solution to the problems of tsking and eyerolling from fellow councilmembers.
13 posted on 04/11/2003 11:46:24 AM PDT by Luna (Evil will not triumph...God is at the helm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
Californians need to wake up and get these ridiculous people out of office!! It's time to take back our state.
14 posted on 04/11/2003 11:54:55 AM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
If this woman wants to know what nasty is, she should come to one of our town meetings when a hot button issue comes up. A quaint New England town tradition.
15 posted on 04/11/2003 11:58:57 AM PDT by Little Bill (No Rats, A.N.S.W.E.R (WWP) is a commie front!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
"Do not use body language ...

Well, Bill Clinton's sycophants ejected a Willie Nelson fan for using body language at a birthday bash.

16 posted on 04/11/2003 12:01:42 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
"I've been called a Nazi."

"I've been told I need to be in a straight jacket with a bag over my head."

She is a smarmy looking cow, sort of reminiscent of Tipper Gore:


17 posted on 04/11/2003 12:18:09 PM PDT by archy (Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
Well, Bill Clinton's sycophants ejected a Willie Nelson fan for using body language at a birthday bash.

Strictly speaking, I believe that was digital communication. :-D

18 posted on 04/11/2003 12:19:19 PM PDT by MortMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Do I understand this right? Apparently it was the council members who were using the "offensive body language"...

Sure, but they'd have exempted themselves from their own requirement. But as an attorney, she has a bigger problem:

"People feel we were treading on the First Amendment and we aren't," Kleinberg said in an interview. "There is no ban, we are not outlawing any expression."

"We were considering a way to promote more open and free debate by discouraging, and that's a pretty important word, discouraging, not prohibiting, intimidating body expressions."

This is why they're REALLY dropping her *great idea* like a hot potato. I also suspect some other lawyer has filed a complaint with the local bar association's disciplinary committee, or with the California state ethics Ccommission, since she has a duty *to avoid even the appearance of impropriety as an attorney and elected official:

United States Code, Title 18, U.S. Criminal Code, Section 242:
Deprivation of rights under color of law:

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or ,if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

You reckon they have an armed bailiff or city cop at those Council meetings?

Title 18, United States Code, U.S. Criminal Code, Section 241.
Conspiracy against rights:

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured - They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

And that would constitute a felony conviction leaving her ineligible to either hold elected office or practice law in the State of California....

-archy-/-

19 posted on 04/11/2003 12:39:48 PM PDT by archy (Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson