Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maxwell
That gobble-dee-gook is harder to read than Ebonics!
137 posted on 04/12/2003 7:32:45 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: reg45; reelfoot
And let us not forget Luce Irigaray's famous article ``Is the Subject of Science Sexed?'', quoted in above by Sokal, in which she points out that...

"..the mathematical sciences, in the theory of wholes [théorie des ensembles], concern themselves with closed and open spaces ... They concern themselves very little with the question of the partially open, with wholes that are not clearly delineated [ensembles flous], with any analysis of the problem of borders [bords] ..."

[snortle] I don't think I can keep from laughing out loud any longer... God, Sokal makes me proud of the profession... For those of you who are curious, check out Sokal's self-expose, "A Physicist Experiments With Cultural Studies", which starts out--

"..to test the prevailing intellectual standards, I decided to try a modest (though admittedly uncontrolled) experiment:
Would a leading North American journal of cultural studies -- whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as Fredric Jameson and Andrew Ross -- publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions?

The answer, unfortunately, is yes."

(All emphases mine)

139 posted on 04/12/2003 7:41:25 PM PDT by maxwell (Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson