Replies

I'm not so sure that other western news agencies would have had the same access as CNN. There is an air of duplicity in this article. I think back to all of the questioning the on-air talent had for this confrontation in the months leading up to the operation. Each and every time "the forehead" or Carville spouted off about the illegitemacy of the Administrations stance, someone upstairs had to know the truth. (you know, the truth, the same truth we've all believed here in this forum)

Sort of akin to their ambassador stating he has had no communication with Saddam, once the regieme had so clearly fallen.

To me, Mr. Jordan is simply swiching sides, in a "Yeah, those guys" fashion, right after they are all caught red handed.

Like others in this thread, I'm most interested in what CNN knows about the Clinton regieme in exactly the same set of circumstances.

"To me, Mr. Jordan is simply swiching sides, in a "Yeah, those guys" fashion, right after they are all caught red handed.

Like others in this thread, I'm most interested in what CNN knows about the Clinton regieme in exactly the same set of circumstances.
"
Yes the Clinton administration knew these things as well as CNN. When Clinton would not stand up to Iraq, CNN should have pulled out, if they were a legitimate news agency, which I don't believe they are.