[AndyJackson]

Excuse me for offering a dissenting view, but just what would you have done that would have saved the employees from being tortured or killed?

Tell me you are kidding. Please?

It is not like we could not have put the heat on Iraq any time between say, 1991 and 2003, like any time in the Regime of Bill and Hillary. But CNN was so busy covering over their misdeeds, that covering over a few more misdeeds was ok. I mean in 1995 one might have dispared that the leadership of the country was such that nothing could be done. But surely, if you are CNN, you can devote your resources to ensuring that there is stronger leadership starting say, in 1996, not mind you that Viagra Bob is my idea of strong leadership, but CNN might have done something about that too. I mean it is not as though Ted Turner needed to work a second shift to feed his family.

But surely you see this, I hope, because after reading this article I have plenty of invective stored up and have some to spare for you.

[diamond6]

Obviously, CNN has a liberal slant, but I really don't think you've answered my question. Instead, you go an emotional rant about Bill Clinton. Do you really think it's a news organization's job to make sure that Bob Dole became president in 1996? I think the Republican party should have presented a much stronger candidate. If they had, Clinton would not have had a second term. But you can blame the American people for turning a blind eye to what Clinton's character was all about and voting for their pocketbooks. But again, this is off the topic, what would you have done?