Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Miss Marple; Lauratealeaf; terilyn
I could not agree more. They were not neutral - they were actively anti-war. Look at the analysts they hired...Wesley Clark the chief culprit. Remember Christian Amanpour's rant against GWB in a college speech?

Why publish this now? My guess is a belated effort to soothe the people with a brain who refuse to watch CNN because of their bias.

OTOH, in all honesty I will never watch CNN even if they line their network with wall to wall conservatives. Ditto the major networks. It's time to stop shrugging off their bias and 'send them a message' the best way possible: vote with the remote.

I feel exactly the same way about MSNBC. They hire two token conservatives because they're getting whipped in the ratings - big deal. They haven't changed their stripes. This is still the network that hired Peter Arnett as a war correspondent, and whose network lineup was built around Chris Matthew. MSNBC only added the token conservatives to boost their ratings - not because they had a change of heart and saw the error of their ways.

Is FOX perfect? No, but their network was fair and balanced BEFORE the war, and when they were BEHIND in the ratings. I will not be seduced by the temptation to see a live report 5 or 15 minutes before FOX. What good is a picture if the person describing it has a political agenda? About 80% of the time, FOX has been there at the same time, or ahead of the competition. The analysts are not only experienced and smart, they are human ... alternately witty and serious, appropriate to the occasion.

And while I'm ranting..LOL...do you think the incessant anti-war, anti-Bush, anti-Pentagon will change at the NYTimes, the publisher of the CNN article? Will they issue an apology for Friedman, Apple, Dowd and the rest? Somehow I don't think so.

Working in the media made me cynical; watching it makes me sick.

955 posted on 04/11/2003 8:16:15 AM PDT by Fracas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies ]


To: Fracas
Good rant. I can't disagree with any of it. The other night I was flipping channels before bed and passed by MSNBC and then went right back. They have this guy who looks like Chandler from Friends and he was giving some kind of commentary. The set up was EXACTLY like O'Reilly's Talking Points! I didn't even listen to Chandler, I just stopped long enough to see what was going on, shake my head and move on.
957 posted on 04/11/2003 8:20:25 AM PDT by retrokitten (She's the one, the only one, built like an Amazon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]

To: Fracas
Working in the media made me cynical; watching it makes me sick.

Great post! You expressed what I think so well.

1,055 posted on 04/11/2003 10:05:06 AM PDT by Lauratealeaf (God be with our troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]

To: Fracas
I couldn't agree more. MSNBC hires a token conservative and now they're suddenly America's News Channel? I don't theeeeenk so!

FOX has been there for conservatives, giving both sides of the story since they went on the air. They have been labeled as a mouthpiece of the Bush Administration, a right-wing hate mongering network, among other ridiculous labels.

I for one have no intention of pointing my remote to any channel other than FOX. A five minute jump on breaking news does nothing for me if I have to listen to it through the eyes of a reporter that feels the need to twist it to fit their agenda!
1,222 posted on 04/11/2003 11:29:16 AM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson