Skip to comments.
France Faces Isolation As Strains Show In Anti-War Axis
The Guardian (UK) ^
| 4-11-2003
| John Hooper/Nick Paton Walsh
Posted on 04/10/2003 8:07:15 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
"Don't Mess With Texas" (Screw France and Germany!)
1
posted on
04/10/2003 8:07:15 PM PDT
by
blam
To: All
God Bless America! God Bless This Man! Some of us VRWC volunteers think freedom is worth fighting for.
|
|
Please join us.
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
04/10/2003 8:08:58 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: blam
But the diplomatic tensions over the role of the UN are sure to be reignited. Gerhard Schröder announced yesterday that Germany would only take part in the reconstruction if the operation were carried out under UN auspices. Sounds like face saving strategy. Germany knows they are going to be out in the cold and are trying to say it is their choice to freeze.
3
posted on
04/10/2003 8:13:44 PM PDT
by
Ruth A.
To: blam
The ones the French better worry about are the Iraqi people who are already ramshacking any thing French in Bagdad.
4
posted on
04/10/2003 8:14:46 PM PDT
by
friendly
To: Support Free Republic
Gerhard Schröder announced yesterday that Germany would only take part in the reconstruction if the operation were carried out under UN auspices.
Keep Your dead economy out if Iraq
5
posted on
04/10/2003 8:15:42 PM PDT
by
scooby321
To: blam
Mr Schröder's setting out of conditions will also alarm German industrialists hoping for lucrative contracts in the aftermath of the conflict.What lucrative contracts? Germany doesn't have a prayer, anymore than france does. Russia does have a chance provided they stop the dirty tricks immediately.
To: blam
His ultimatum highlighted the point that Germany's position remains more uncompromising than that of France. Yes, but the French are more obnoxious than the Germans.
To: blam
I suspect Blair and Chirac really loathe each other. I think Blair believes that Chirac's main goal was to depose him as PM since Blair was an obstacle in Chirac's grand plan of creating a European counterweight to the US dominated by the Franco-German axis. Blair is a skillful infighter however in a way Bush is not (with Bush what you see is what you get; he tends to play his cards face up), and Blair will twist the knife into Chirac's corpus without leaving much in the way of fingerprints.
8
posted on
04/10/2003 8:18:55 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: blam
The backpedaling by Chirac, Schroeder and Putin is disgraceful. All three want their perceived share of the spoils without lifting a finger. Hope Bush and Blair give all three the finger.
To: blam
btttt
10
posted on
04/10/2003 8:24:33 PM PDT
by
ellery
To: lilylangtree
All three want their perceived share of the spoils without lifting a finger. Hope Bush and Blair give all three the finger.ping... :)
11
posted on
04/10/2003 8:33:48 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because your paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
To: skinkinthegrass
Only yesterday, after the fall of Saddam Hussein, did Mr Chirac issue a comment. "France, like all democracies, rejoices," he said in a statement. Just like the French. Always there for you when they need you.
12
posted on
04/10/2003 8:37:36 PM PDT
by
Terabitten
(Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of All Who Threaten It)
To: BunnySlippers
Yes, but the French are more obnoxious than the Germans.
And, of course, the Germans really do have good beer. While French wine is much over rated.
13
posted on
04/10/2003 8:38:09 PM PDT
by
D Rider
To: lilylangtree
agreed.
14
posted on
04/10/2003 8:39:23 PM PDT
by
lawgirl
(Infinite Rider on the Big Dogma)
To: lilylangtree
I can't believe how totally tone deaf this trio has been diplomatically. I don't think that I have ever seen anything to compare it to.
15
posted on
04/10/2003 8:39:59 PM PDT
by
RJayneJ
To: blam
Didn't the french invent the douchebag? That's fitting.
16
posted on
04/10/2003 8:42:29 PM PDT
by
timydnuc
(FR)
To: blam
What I don't get is what did Chirac expect to happen? Did he really expect us to fail? I mean surely he knew Bush would do as he said, so I presume he expected us to fail?
Otherwise I don't understand his foolish behavior before the war.
To: Torie
Blair will twist the knife into Chirac's corpus without leaving much in the way of fingerprints. I certainly hope you are right, Torie. You would know Blair's stratigy better than me, but do you think that the Belfast meeting was pure show? It had me, and still does, greatly disturbed that the UN was going to be involved in something other than food. I would consider that a defeat on par with not getting Saddam back in 91. Are you convinced this won't happen and this Weasel axis is making a fool of itself?
18
posted on
04/10/2003 8:54:53 PM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
("As long as it takes...No. That's the answer to your question. As long as it takes." GWB)
To: McGavin999
The Germans and French have already had their lucrative contracts, unfortunately it appears to have been for weapons for Iraq. Being the peace lovers they claim to be, the weapons and materials sales might be a wee bit contradictory.
They are beginning to understand there is no forgiveness on this side of the pond.
19
posted on
04/10/2003 8:56:13 PM PDT
by
LaGrone
To: blam
Today's St Petersburg meeting was planned before the fall of Baghdad and was intended to seal an anti-war alliance
Hmmm, Germany & Russia [and later Vichy France] getting together to for an anti-war alliance. How does this sound familiar
?
Treaty of Nonaggression Between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
The Government of the German Reich and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics desirous of strengthening the cause of peace between Germany and the U.S.S.R and proceeding from the fundamental provisions of the Neutrality Agreement concluded in April 1926 between Germany and the U.S.S.R., have reached the following agreement:
ARTICLE I
Both High Contracting Parties obligate, themselves to desist from any act of violence, any aggressive action, and any attack on each other, either individually or jointly with other powers.
ARTICLE II
Should one of the High Contracting Parties become the object of belligerent action by a third power, the other High Contracting Party shall in no manner lend its support to this third power.
ARTICLE III
The Governments of the two High Contracting Parties shall in the future maintain continual contact with one another for the purpose of consultation in order to exchange information on problems affecting their common interests.
ARTICLE IV
Neither of the two High Contracting Parties shall participate in any grouping of powers whatsoever that is directly or indirectly aimed at the other party.
ARTICLE V
Should disputes or conflicts arise between the High Contracting Parties over problems of one kind or another, both parties shall settle these disputes or conflicts exclusively through friendly exchange of opinion or, if necessary, through the establishment of arbitration commissions.
ARTICLE VI
The present treaty is concluded for a period of ten years, with the provision that, in so far as one of the High Contracting Parties does not denounce it one year prior to the expiration of this period, the validity of this treaty shall automatically be extended for another five years.
ARTICLE VI
The present treaty shall be ratified within the shortest possible time. The ratifications shall be exchanged in Berlin. The agreement shall enter into force as soon as it is signed. Done in duplicate, in the German and Russian languages.
MOSCOW, August 23, 1939.
For the Government of the German Reich:
V. RIBBENTROP
With full power of the Government of the U.S.S.R.:
V. MOLOTOV
20
posted on
04/10/2003 8:56:34 PM PDT
by
Plutarch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson