Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: walden
Uranium is far more abundant than plutonium and methods to separate, purify and mold weapons-grade uranium are not particularly technically advanced or expensive. Plutonium manufacture and purification, in contrast, is one of the most advanced weapon-fabrication processes.

OK, since we actually do have people who know what they're talking about on this thread...

Hasn't SUCKFOR gotten this 100% reversed? It's easier to build the BOMB once you have the material from uranium rather than plutonium (you can build a simple "gun" for the uranium, but need a complicated implosion sphere for the plutonium) but it's actually less expensive and easier to create weapons grade plutonium with a reactor than go throug the lengthy and complicated process to chemically enrich Uranium?

My impression was that the facilities at Oak Ridge for Uranium were far more expensive and vast than the reactors at Hanford for Plutonium in the Manhattan Project.

Please correct if I'm mistaken.

55 posted on 04/10/2003 7:30:54 PM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: John H K
Actually, they reported just a little while ago on Fox that the Marines initially got the positive readings, and called in the Marine chem/bio team to verify. They got the same positive results.

So now they are simply guarding the facility until some independent testing can be completed.
57 posted on 04/10/2003 8:15:45 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson