Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: backhoe
Pinched this from another thread the other day. Can't vouch for it accuracy.


5 posted on 04/10/2003 4:35:12 PM PDT by WSGilcrest (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WSGilcrest
Also France was top receipient in the "oil for food" program, followed by Russia.
7 posted on 04/10/2003 4:39:57 PM PDT by spokeshave ( against dead wood (albore) Frogs & Rats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WSGilcrest
Pinched this from another thread the other day. Can't vouch for it accuracy

I can. It's not accurate. The "1%" number for the USA includes unarmed civilian helicopters (Bell 212/214, etc) that were sold to Iraq for civilian purposes and then confiscated by the Iraqi military and used as VIP transports. Since they are unarmed, they should not count as "weapons", and since they weren't sold to the military they should also not count as "weapons". The correct percentage for the USA should be zero on this chart, because other than these helicopters, nothing in the Iraqi inventory is made in the USA.

20 posted on 04/10/2003 5:06:33 PM PDT by Technogeeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WSGilcrest
Here is another source with the same info. It is from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. From the name, hardly a right-wing organization.

Main page for Iraqi arms purchases

Table with values for each year by country and totals for year and country

Table showing detail of what type of weapons

I found it interesting that what we sold them was a total of 117 helicopters over a three year period from 1983-1985 of which 87 were intended for civilian use but taken over by the military. I would hardly call that arming them. France sold them 108 Mirage Fighter jets. Russia was the big supplier overall with just one sale being 2,150 T-62 tanks. But as far as just tanks go, China sold them 2,600.

26 posted on 04/10/2003 5:21:13 PM PDT by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WSGilcrest
good chart
32 posted on 04/10/2003 5:29:15 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WSGilcrest
Well, I saw the same graph in the Weekly Standard Magazine - which means it passed their veracity checks. It looks right to me!
33 posted on 04/10/2003 5:30:01 PM PDT by MortMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WSGilcrest
Nice chart!
43 posted on 04/10/2003 7:42:48 PM PDT by WOSG (Liberate Iraq! God Bless our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WSGilcrest
I went to the web site reference on that bar chart, and it looks reasonably credible. Heck, its from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Certainly not the kind of organization to be biased in favor the U.S.A.

Lefties don't have an argument there.
46 posted on 04/10/2003 8:54:26 PM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WSGilcrest
Why can´t I find GERMANY on that list?

You all claimed that Germany had something to hide and had doubts that it´s just their radical pacifism...

The electronics for the Scuds? Oh yeah, ok. But that´s not secret and that was delivered until 1991...

So, I ask you: what has the German government (that is in office since 1998 - before that Kohl was in power) to hide?

49 posted on 04/11/2003 1:52:14 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson