To: Tailgunner Joe
Actually, this question is a completely irrelevant ad hominem.No, it isn't.
It's painfully relevant.
We have women in supply clerk positions because men aren't enlisting in sufficient numbers to ensure that there aren't any women in supply clerk positions.
I don't see a mass movement to solve this problem, either.
38 posted on
04/10/2003 4:50:32 PM PDT by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: Poohbah
"We have women in supply clerk positions because men aren't enlisting in sufficient numbers to ensure that there aren't any women in supply clerk positions."
I dunno about that. I've heard that the services actually *reserve* a certain percentage of slots for women.
If my memory is faulty (and that's entirely possible), can someone point it out? An active-duty recruiter should be able to set the record straight.
74 posted on
04/10/2003 8:35:10 PM PDT by
PLMerite
("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson