Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elfman2
I don't think that I'd agree. Do you know how rare it would be to take prisoner from a US Division or Corps HQ Btn? I don't, but it must be very small.

You're thinking of good old-fashioned mass army slugfests from 1943, not the irregular battlefied of 2003. This wouldn't have happened in 1943.

Corps and Division HQs would be prime targets--take one of them down, and you pretty much reduce its formation to a loose collection of brigades without long-haul comms, theater and national intel access, et cetera.

28 posted on 04/10/2003 4:28:08 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
"You're thinking of good old-fashioned mass army slugfests from 1943"

I'm not sure of your position. Are you saying that in today's battlefield, with enemies that we're most likely to face, Corps level personnel are as likely to be captured as those in units closer to the front? No.

Maybe killed if we face an enemy like China,… maybe. But any force that could do that's much more likely to actually honor the Geneva Convention prisoner of war rules and not gang rape our women. We don't fight civilized nations. (Now you're thinking of WWII) We're at real risk of fighting barbaric POSs like Iraq, Iran, Syria or NK, and they won't likely be capturing people at the Cops HQ level.

35 posted on 04/10/2003 4:42:52 PM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson