Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STRENGTHENING AMERICAN BORDERS AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION (Tancredo speech)
Limitstogrowth.org ^ | Apr. 8, 2003 | Tom Tancredo

Posted on 04/10/2003 9:51:52 AM PDT by madfly

l

STRENGTHENING AMERICAN BORDERS
AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
(House of Representatives - April 08, 2003)

[Page: H2918] --- The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Porter). Under the Speaker's announced policy of January 7, 2003, the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Tancredo) is recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.

Mr. TANCREDO. Mr. Speaker, I come to the floor tonight to discuss the issue of immigration and immigration reform. It is a topic that I often take this floor in order to advance, and I have over the last several weeks chosen to separate the topic up into various component parts. And we talked about immigration reform and how much it was needed because of the dangerous situations that exist on our borders. That was the first week.

We talked about, the next week, I tried to address the issue of immigration and open borders and what that meant to the importation of drugs into the country and the impact that that is having on our land.

Today I am going to talk about another aspect of this subject that is seldom discussed. It is one that a lot of people do not want to really focus on because they are not sure how to deal with it. I think specifically of the people in, say, the Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth, and a variety of other environmental organizations that are out there and that focus in on matters that harm the environment; and they have constantly come to us, come to this body in the form of lobbying activity to tell us that we have to do more to protect the land and the environment, the water, the air, because of what man is doing to it. And yet there is almost a deafening silence, if you will, from the same people, the same organizations, when it comes to the degradation of the land that is as a result of the massive numbers of people coming across our borders illegally, the millions of people that are crossing these borders.

There is a great quote from a gentleman who is the program manager of something called the National Parks Conservation Association. His name is Randall Rasmussen. Mr. Rasmussen said, "Organ Pipe National Monument is becoming Organ Pipe National Catastrophe." I call it the Organ Pipe Cactus National Dump.

I have been down there several times in Arizona. Of course, that part of the country is beautiful. Arizona has a 372-mile border with Mexico and it ranges from very sandy deserts and lava flows in the West, where you get about 3 or 4 inches of rainfall in a wet year, to oak-dotted grasslands and mountain-top forests in the East, where snowfall may be measured in feet. Really, few areas of the North American continent boast such natural beauty and such a great amount of diversity. Yet, cutting across that landscape is one huge problem.

The entire region is getting hammered by wave after wave after wave of illegal border crossers, by horse, by foot, by bicycle, motorcycle, all-terrain vehicles, cars, trucks, even utralight gliders. They stream across the border every day and every night. They dump tons of trash and human feces in places that are set aside for their scenic beauty. They blaze hundreds of new roads and trails through fragile desert soils. They ruin habitats for endangered species and they start forest fires that consume hundreds of thousands of acres of forest and brush.

When I was visiting the Coronado National Forest not too long ago, I left there on a Sunday morning and a fire started by an illegal alien campsite had been left unattended after starting a warming fire in the evening, and then they walk on, and they leave the fire often times burning, it caught the rest of the brush on fire, and before I got back to Denver on the plane, before I got back to Denver, it had consumed 35,000 acres in the Coronado National Forest. We did not hear much about that. Even if we did, we probably only heard about the fire, but no one wanted to talk about how it started because this is a delicate subject. This is because people get very antsy, even here in this body, when we start talking about immigration and the impact of illegal immigration especially on the Nation.

The reason why I have divided this subject up into various component parts is because it is an enormous subject. It has enormous, massive implications, immigration, that is, for our Nation. I have often said that it will determine not just what kind of a Nation we will be in the future, that is divided and balkanized, it will determine whether or not we will be a Nation at all. And there are, as I say, implications of massive immigration into this country which are absolutely incredible and need to be talked about, need to be debated, even if it makes people uncomfortable. And certainly this is one part of it. This is just one part. That is the environment.

Mr. Speaker, I have been down to the border several times. I have been both to the northern and southern borders of the country. And the sites that I see are sites I wish many of my colleagues here on the floor would also see. Sites like this on Department of Interior wildland where new trails, abandoned vehicles, trash, and human waste are strewn. These are trails that you see all over that particular part of country. Trails like this. When you look on a trail map, by the way, there is no trail there on the map, because these are not official trails. These are all made by people walking through by the hundreds, by the thousands; in fact, by the millions. Once they start these trails, they will use them for a couple of weeks, and then they think that we put sensors on them, and sometimes we do, the Border Patrol puts a sensor on there, so therefore what will happen is they will move over a little bit.

When you fly over this area, you look down and it looks like cobwebs that spread out from a particular area coming across the border, but it is really just the number of people that have come across by foot, by horse, even, as I say, bicycles sometimes, and often times by cars. Vehicles will be driving along a highway that is adjacent to a national park or some sort of protected site, we will say a national forest, and at some point in time they just decide this is it, and they will peel right off of the highway and start right through the forest. And so as you drive along that road, it may be a blacktop road, as you drive along you can see on both sides where people have simply driven off the road into the desert and, of course, are trying to take people into this country and drugs into this country illegally, and they have caused enormous damage to that environment.

They leave cars. Again, once they abandon the vehicle, once they take the drugs that they were carrying in or the people that they are carrying in and move them to a driven form of transportation, they usually abandon the vehicle. So if you fly over this area you will see literally hundreds and hundreds of abandoned vehicles in the desert rotting away. They leave clothes. They leave trash, water bottles like this in areas sometimes that encompass 50 or 60 acres and are knee-deep in trash. These are called pick-up sites. These sites are areas where people will come to on foot. They will come across the border on foot into the United States, and then they have been told where they should gather. And it is often on private land. It is often, however, in the middle of a national park or a national forest area. They gather and they wait to be picked up to be taken into the interior of the United States.

Sometimes these groups will be as large as several hundred. And over the course of about a month, many thousands will have gathered in one place, waiting for their transportation into the United States. And they are told by the people who bring them here, and often times we refer to these people as "coyotes," these are people paid by Mexican immigrants, primarily Mexicans, but certainly not entirely by Mexicans, paid by the immigrant coming into the country, the illegal, sometimes $1,500, sometimes if the case is more difficult it gets more expensive, where in fact we have cases today where we are looking very carefully at people coming into the country from places like Iraq and Iran and all over the Middle East. These folks have to pay upwards of $30,000 to have to be smuggled into the United States. So it has become a very big business.

[Page: H2919]

Once they get them into these pick-up sites they tell them you have to discard everything you have got, everything you have been carrying, all the water bottles, all the trash, the food, the clothes, discard everything because we have to pack you into, well, they do not tell them why, they just tell them that they have to discard everything. Then they pack them so tight into the backs of cars and trucks and trailers and vans that many suffocate on the way up. But what they do, of course, is to make room for more people. That is why they tell them everything has to be abandoned here.

When you walk through these pick-up sites you will see literally tons and tons and tons of trash. You will be overcome sometimes by the smell because, of course, this is also a place where people deposit their own human waste. And so the feces by thousands of people in this area, this is certainly not a pleasant topic, I assure you, but it also is not just unpleasant from an olfactory sense, it does not just smell bad; when it does get a little bit of rain into this area, that is washed into some of the water supplies. We have had ranches down there where farm animals and ranch animals have stopped drinking in the wells. They have essentially been ruined by this kind of activity. It does seep, of course, into the ground, then, after it has been washed down into this arroyos. This is not the kind of area, this is not the kind of land where that kind of waste can be disposed of easily.

The rest of this stays in place. The Border Patrol is not going to pick it up. The ranchers try to pick it up because it becomes very dangerous, but they can spend their entire day, week, month, year, picking up trash on their land. Their cattle eat this trash, especially that black plastic that most of us have seen and we certainly use ourselves. It is strewn all over the desert and the cattle will eat that and die. We have had thousands of head of cattle here that eat this trash and that die as a result of it. These are just, as I say, some of the environmental problems that you have when you have got literally hundreds of thousands, in fact, millions of people coming across this land.

We have had archeological areas, areas of great archeological value destroyed. In Pinacate, which is also a national park, the Mexican soldiers destroyed some of the archeological areas, including one with a 100,000-year-old drawing on the wall. This was according to the Pinacate Park Director, Carlos Castillo.

In addition, the Mexican Army has dug deep trenches to destroy 19 clandestine airstrips which mar hundreds of acres of volcanic desert that took 4 million years to form.

[Time: 19:00]

These soldiers' markings could last for another 100 years.

Few parks really have taken a greater toll than the U.N.-designated biosphere reserve El Pinacate and Arizona's adjoining Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument.

Last year, officials caught 200,000 migrants coming through Organ Pipe. Remember, we get one in five. That is a conservative estimate. I think it is closer to one in 10 we actually will try to interdict; 200,000 were caught in Organ Pipe last year; 700,000 pounds of drugs were confiscated in Organ Pipe last year.

The drug runners use every imaginable form of transportation: cars, trucks, ATVs. When they are chased, they throw these spikes out behind them, so that the border patrol, whoever may be chasing them, have their own tires blown out. This is something, of course, that our border police and law enforcement agencies use themselves, the spikes to stop people who are chasing. In this case, the trespassers, the people carrying either individuals or drugs, throw out these spikes to stop the people from chasing them.

Again, cars that are abandoned all over the forest, these kinds of roads that have been cut into the forest. Ruts that have been created by so many cars coming across this area; this will not go away for hundreds of years.

They cut down some of the cactus that actually grows in this area, I mean, actually Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, that is why they call it that, that is why the park is there because it does not grow anywhere else. This is a unique form of cactus. They are cut down and saguaro cactus are cut down and laid across the roads as obstacles so people when they will be driving along the road they stop, their cars are carjacked. They are taken and used to transport drugs and/or illegals and then abandoned all over the area.

Meth labs, this is another interesting one. This is mostly on the northern border, but not exclusive to the northern border.

In Canada, there is a group in Calgary, about 25,000 actually; about 25,000 Muslims reside in the Calgary, Canada area. Strange as that may sound to some, that is the case. There are really several hundred thousand Muslims in Canada. They have been immigrating to Canada for the last several years. This one group in Calgary, according to the folks I talked to that work security for the national parks and the national forests, are telling me that this group is the one that is primarily responsible for the importation into the United States of millions and millions and millions of tabs that are the component parts for methamphetamine. They are shipped from Calgary into the United States. They are cooked at these meth labs that are out there in the national parks and then the proceeds from the sale of these methamphetamine go back up to the organization in Canada, the Muslim group in Canada; and they use that money to support the terrorist activities all over the world.

This particular site, this is a meth lab that is being cleaned up in a national park. People have to come in there with hazmat suits. It is a very, very dangerous area; and for every pound of methamphetamine, there are 6 or 7 pounds of this material that is left, and it is a very dangerous substance. It has to be treated like this, as I say, hazmat suits and very, very carefully.

The drug smugglers will use natural caverns and/or tunnels, caves to deposit this stuff. So we have got kids, we have got hikers, bikers, we have got people coming in walking through the national parks, legitimately walking through, legitimately trying to enjoy the scenery and will go down into these caverns and into these various caves and come in contact with this material and become quite ill.

The fact is that the animal life in most of our national parks have been damaged by so many people coming through. This is a pristine environment with a lot of people coming across the deserts. We find that some of the migration patterns for some of these animals are disrupted. They are kept oftentimes away from water because that is where these pick-up sites are. So some, like the Sonoran pronged horn, which is an endangered species, is becoming even more endangered as a result of this kind of activity in their environment. Take this cactus. As I said earlier, these are unique in the world, this kind of cactus, organ pipes. We can see here the graffiti that they have carved into it.

This goes on and on, and yet nothing is really said about this. Nothing is done about this part of it. It is fascinating to me, we actually send billions of dollars around the world to Third World countries, Mr. Speaker. We hear the discussion on the floor of the House. I hear it in the Committee on Resources.

We spend billions of taxpayers dollars in Third World countries because we say in these countries we have to do something to help them create an economic environment where they will stop degrading their own environment, where they will stop destroying the forests, where they will stop cutting down old-growth forests, where they will stop polluting because they are doing it because they are a Third World country, they are very poor; and so we have to come in there and try to help them.

We go to Africa. We spend billions of dollars in Africa and in Latin America trying to get them to change their economy, trying to do something to get them to stop doing what they are doing to their land, and we do this with great relish, and we do it in this way that makes us think and feel good that we have taken care of our land. We know how to deal with our problems. We know how to deal with the environment in the United States. We have passed law after law after law. We have slapped people into chains and sent them off to jail. We have fined companies billions of dollars. We will pick a person up in certain States and arrest them for littering. I mean, we have got signs along the highway that says no littering. We do a lot of stuff in the United States, but we completely ignore these particular phenomena in our own country.

We have National Geographic specials, we see them all the time on television. They are documentaries talking about how we need to do things in countries around the world to address the problem of the degradation of our environment on a worldwide basis, but no one will talk about this.

No one will talk about the smugglers that have left 95 percent of their garbage and junk vehicles in our borders. At Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, smugglers have made a 26-mile road into the Growler Valley that slices into protected wilderness. I saw that road. I have been down to Cabeza Prieta. Along the refuges is famed Camino del Diablo where crosses mark places where 19th century travelers paid for their ignorance of the area with their lives.

The dirt is now a dirt road. It features big pits of nearly impassable moon dust. Smugglers just drive around these areas, widening these pits a quarter mile into the wilderness. It is estimated to fix the dirt road up to $30 million. That is if we can get down there to fix it, but they are probably not going to get appropriations for that purpose because why? Because that particular part of our environment, that particular problem was caused by illegal immigration, and we do not want to talk about that so we are going to ignore it.

As I mentioned earlier, there are cars all over. Officials estimate smugglers drove 5,000 cars through protected wilderness last year alone. Once that road is there, it will be there for 60 to 70 years, says Vergial Harper, the refuge's outdoor recreation planner. Seventeen abandoned vehicles now sit in the Growler Valley area. They probably have to be removed by helicopters to minimize further damage to the soil that serves as the skin of the desert, as they put it.

Do my colleagues know how much it costs to try and get one vehicle out of there by helicopter? It is a very expensive undertaking. There are thousands of vehicles all over the desert.

On a recent afternoon in Organ Pipe, discarded water bottles, backpacks, hot sauce containers, and Spanish-language comic books littered the ground around a sprawling ironwood tree estimated to be 1,000 years old.

Another endangered species' affected growth in Tucson, the Pima pineapple cactus, is also in the way of crossborder traffic. Just northeast of Nogales, fences meant to protect a patch of these cacti from being knocked down and allowing cattle to enter and possibly trample them, well, anyway, the fence is being destroyed. The crossers, the horses and their vehicles, have also gone right through that same plot.

The tiny cacti "don't have any legs. They can't get up and move," Coronado national forest spokesman Gail Aschenbrenner said. At Leslie Canyon Wildlife Refuge near Douglas, areas thick with a particular kind of water umbel, an endangered plant, had been trampled to death by illegal immigrants waiting to be picked up, according to a congressional study. The plant has adapted to flood, draught and water fluctuation, said refuge manager Bill Radke, but not adapted to people squashing it.

So much of this has been documented by the kind of information that even the Congress has had at its disposal by hearings, by the CRS, the Congressional Research Service, and again, nothing, absolutely nothing, done.

Let us talk about fires for a moment. Illegal border crossers are suspected of causing eight major wild fires in southern Arizona in 2002 sticking taxpayers with $5.1 million in fire fighting costs. These eight fires that charred 68,000 acres are nearly 108 square miles near the border according to the Arizona Daily Star. Only the fires bigger than 100 acres were included in that analysis, but officials say border crossers cause many smaller blazes that were quickly controlled. Food containers, juice cans, water bottles from Mexico were found at many of the fires' starting points.

The Ryan fire, a 38,000 acre fire that raced across grasslands toward Fort Huachuca in late April and early May. The Oversight fire burned 2,189 acres in the Huachuca Mountains. The Walker Community fire burned 17,000 acres west of Nogales in June. These were all started by illegal aliens.

When we were down there, it was fascinating to talk to the people, the forest service. They will tell you, they now have changed the way that they actually try to fight the fires because it has gotten so dangerous to go in there. There are so many people coming through those forests with guns protecting drug trafficking activities that they do not go into the forests at night even to fight the fire. So the fires are allowed to burn because we are afraid to send people in there. We are also afraid to dump the retardant on there because we are dumping it on a lot of people who are out there. These are illegal aliens, but there are so many in the forests that we cannot fight fires appropriately.

The whole area is susceptible to this kind of thing, and yet again, where are the environmental groups? I hear from them. I am sure every Member of this body hears from people in the Sierra Club and everybody else that are demanding that we do more to protect the environment. Where are the groups demanding that we do something to stop illegal immigration and the degradation to the land that occurs as a result of this policy of open borders?

Just considering the environmental damage alone, we can wonder why those dedicated to the protection of the land and its resources have never intervened forcefully in any way. For example, the County of Santa Barbara, California, where lawyers representing environmental groups are ever ready to go to court on behalf of possible damage to oaks, endangered species, habitat or wetlands, if they are disturbed in any way by the action of California ranchers or farmers on their own property. If there are similar organizations in Arizona, the vast environmental damage being done by hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants does not seem to disturb them.

Evidently, political correctness demands that one first consider who is destroying the environment, not the extent of the destruction itself or whether it should be stopped. With environmental groups these days, social justice is in the form of immigrant rights; and it trumps concerns about overpopulation, damage to plants, land and wildlife; and those are the quality of life issues in the United States.

These priorities mirror those of the Ford and associated major charitable foundations from both the National Council of La Raza and the Sierra Club where they give their financial support.

Interestingly, the Sierra Club does have one part of its organization, maybe 30 or 40 percent of their membership, that have decided to start sort of a splinter group, I guess I would say, in the Sierra Club. And they in fact have actually done a pretty good job of trying to bring to the attention of the rest of the members of the Sierra Club the problems that are endemic with our national grasslands, our national parks, and our national forests as a result of our completely and totally abandoned borders.

This is from a report to the House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations on impacts caused by undocumented aliens crossing Federal lands in southeastern Arizona. It was a joint project by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Department of the Interior and the Environmental Protection Agency. It was completed on April 29, 2002. It has only recently been released. It constitutes an extensive and official documentation of the harm that migrant smuggling has done to the fragile ecosystems and natural resources in southeastern Arizona, and, one might reasonably conclude, other frequently traveled areas along the southern border.

Sometimes our environmentally based arguments fall on deaf ears because environmental effects are indirect or long term. I am reading from a report that was issued by FAIR, an organization devoted to immigration reform. Here are some of the quotes from the report to the House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations on impacts caused by undocumented aliens. Here are some of the quotes.

Page 2: Undocumented aliens crossing Federal lands in southeast Arizona not only cause damage to natural and cultural resources, they impact Federal land visitors, public services, Federal employees working in the area, and residents and businesses located on Federal and reservation lands.

Impact visitors: Let me tell my colleagues what happens. Here is mom and dad out there in their Winnebago, camped out in any one of these different types of campgrounds in our national parks, and all of a sudden, and this has happened, all of a sudden they look out the window of the camper and there, coming across the camping ground, is a group being led by a guy with an M-16, a bunch of people carrying 60-pound backpacks carrying drugs, and a guy following them with another M-16. And I am sure they thought to themselves, this is a national park? This is a campground? Am I in the right place?

Well, yes, they are in the right place. They have been confronted, their vehicles have been vandalized and stolen by these people, and they have been threatened by folks smuggling drugs across that border and through our national parks. Yet nobody really seems to care.

Another quote: Certain Federal lands in southeast Arizona can no longer be used safely by the public. These are our public lands. This is where we want to go when we want to take the kids out hiking, camping, and fishing. Certainly Federal lands in southeast Arizona can no longer be used safely by the public or Federal employees due to the significance of smuggling of undocumented aliens and controlled substances into the United States. The mere number of undocumented aliens traveling in the border area intimidates legitimate visitors and creates a reluctance by some in the public to use the public lands.

I guarantee that is true. There are people who are afraid to actually go into our own public lands.

Another quote: Ranchers, farmers, miners, and other legitimate users of Federal lands are heavily impacted financially by smuggling operations that cut fences, break down or leave gates open, damage water supplies, steal or damage equipment, and disrupt grazing and irrigation schedules.

Every week I come on the floor with a picture of another person we are inducting into the Homeland Heroes Hall of Fame. These are primarily ranchers down along the Arizona border that are having their entire lives turned upside down. Their ranches are being destroyed, and their government does not seem to care one iota. They are not coming to help them, but they are facing the brunt of the invasion. And it is just that. It is an invasion. That is the appropriate word. Michelle Malkin, author, uses that word to describe her book. In fact, it is title of her book, and it is about this phenomena. And it is absolutely accurate. It is an invasion, but we do not intend to address it.

We are fearful of actually trying to stop it for fear that there will be a political backlash here; for fear that some of the business interests that support our side of the aisle will say we need the cheap labor; for fear some of the immigrant and lawyer groups that support the other side of the aisle will say, look, these are all going to be voters sometime and they comprise a big chunk of our voter base, so let us not talk about illegal immigration. These are the reasons why we do not face the issue of invasion.

Going back to the report: Breaking and entering and burglaries along the border are common and include historic and government structures, employees, and private residences and businesses.

Another quote: Federal law enforcement officers assigned to land management agencies and tribal police often face situations where they are at personal risk and must deal with overwhelming odds.

In Arizona, on the reservation land that we refer to as the Tohono O'odham Indian Reservation, they have about 1,500 people a day coming in to their land, 1,500 a day coming in to that tribe's lands, coming across it and destroying the land and the life-style of the people who live there. Go down and talk to the Tohono O'odham Indians yourself. Talk to the people who try their best to maintain some degree of order on that reservation and they will tell you it is a madhouse. Life there is a nightmare for them. I have seen little children, 5 years old, walking around stoned. The drug smugglers have turned several small villages there into their encampments essentially, because they have been able to, both with drugs and money, entice people into participating in this activity.

Going back to the report: The character of congressionally designated wilderness areas have been reduced by the creation of unwanted trails and roads, damage to existing trails, and large amounts of trash. Encounters with large groups of undocumented aliens reduces the quality of the wilderness experience for many visitors.

I assure my colleagues that that is true. When someone comes across a bunch of people carrying drugs in and guns on their backs, it does have a tendency to, as they put it here, to decrease the quality of the wilderness experience.

Gates are rammed, security locks are cut, signs are driven over and heavy damage or destruction of water developments and other improvements by undocumented aliens traveling through the Federal lands and seeking drinking water in remote locations occur regularly. Some ranchers actually put out cups for these folks and say, look, do not destroy the well, do not break the pipeline, here is a cup, here is water. But they have disregarded it. There is some animosity there. They break the pipeline, they pollute the well, and move on.

Recreational, cultural, and administrative sites are repeatedly vandalized and damaged, 1,000-year-old carvings destroyed.

Would that not have made the front page in most papers around the country if that had happened by a bunch of vandals destroying some pristine area, some prehistoric site, for instance, like that? That certainly would have made the news somewhere. But you did not see a word here. Why? Because it was done by illegals. In one case it was done by the Mexican Army coming across the border. Why were they in the United States? They were protecting a drug load; protecting drug traffickers coming into the United States.

Believe me, the Mexican Army, which is on the border to a large extent, is not there to protect the border. They are there essentially to provide cover for illegal drug activity on that border.

Going back to the report: Tons of trash and concentrations of human waste are left behind by undocumented aliens. This impacts wildlife, vegetation, and water quality in the uplands, in washes and along the rivers and streams. It also detracts from scenic qualities and can affect human and animal health from the spread of bacteria and disease.

We have not even gotten into the issue of disease tonight. We will talk about that more at a later time.

State, county, and local governments and private property owners experience most of the same problems caused by undocumented aliens crossing their lands as mentioned herein. Additionally, there is a significant increased workload on Federal and local court systems and increased costs to medical providers caring for the sick and injured. Health care providers especially are heavily impacted. Twenty-six percent of all the people in Federal prisons are illegal aliens, 26 percent in Federal prisons. We do not know how much it is in State and local prisons all over the Nation. Hospitals, especially their neonatal care units, are closing up all over. Douglas Hospital is going through bankruptcy. If it goes under, it is going under because of the care they provide to illegal immigrants, without of course reimbursement. If it goes under, there will not be a hospital around for 100 miles.

Back to the report: Literally hundreds, if not a thousand or more, of new trails have been created on Federal lands in southeastern Arizona by undocumented alien crossings. And more and more trails are being created by the hundreds of thousands that cross Federal lands in southeastern Arizona each year. This proliferation of trails damages and destroys cactus and other sensitive vegetation, disrupts and prohibits revegetation, disturbs wildlife and their cover and travel routes, causes soil compaction and erosion, impacts stream bank stability, and oftentimes confuses legitimate uses of trails on Federal lands.

There are so many trails on lands that people that are out there legitimately are looking for a way to get around the land, and they take these trails that the drug users have created and, of course, go off into never-never land.

The impacts of such fragmentation are perhaps most severe to breeding birds, many of which nest directly on the ground in short shrubs and trees on or adjacent to the network of undocumented alien routes. The continual disturbance to nesting birds during day and night typically leads to direct nest failure or abandonment of breeding birds. That leads to increased predation on active nests and keeps birds from maintaining egg temperatures and adequately feeding any young that do hatch.

Again, let me suggest that if this were happening anywhere else in the world, especially anywhere else in our country, there would be an outcry on this floor. There would be an outcry heard by every news outlet in the Nation. They would interrupt the report about the war to talk about the fact that some bird has been removed from its nest, or its nesting area has been destroyed by some sort of action taken by man. In this case, however, because it is an illegal immigrant, we will not hear a word about it.

There are high concentrations of human fecal material in heavily used undocumented alien pickup points in and adjacent to washes, rivers, and streams and in other heavily traveled routes. This also impacts wildlife, vegetation, and water quality in the uplands, in washes, and along rivers and streams. The human waste presents a health risk to all people.

Now, this is in a report that is provided to this body and to the United States of America, to the people in this Nation. We provide this particular information. And what happens as a result of it? I wonder if any of my colleagues have ever read it. I wonder if any of the news media that so quickly uses this kind of thing to pick up on when they say a report delivered today to Congress talks about environmental damage, talks about global warming, talks about how the world is changing as a result of man's interference with nature. Usually, that just gets snapped up like that if there is one sentence in any Federal report, scientifically supported, that draws attention to some problem with the environment, especially some problem that we can attribute to mankind. Well, we certainly cannot attribute this to anything else.

There is no way to say that what I have talked about here tonight is not a problem created by human beings. What we can say, however, is that this problem is not being solved. It is not being solved because there is not some technical solution, or maybe we just do not have the right kind of pollution control device and/or we have not come up with the correct mix for gasoline to remove some of the pollutants.

We cannot say that is why this pollution is occurring in our national forests. We can say it is occurring because we do not have the will to stop it. We are destroying this land. It will be gone. Our children will never be able to enjoy it. Certainly their grandchildren will not be able to, and how will we explain this to them.

Will we say it was because we just did not have the technology, but there was an argument about whether or not it was really caused by man's interference or whether it is natural. No, that is not an argument that we can use in this situation. We know what has created this. It is millions and millions and millions of feet across this land every year. It is hundreds of thousands of vehicles coming across this land every year. And for what purpose? To enter this country, to do so illegally, to bring human beings or drugs into the Nation. That is the purpose. Because we find that so sensitive, so off the charts when we are talking about issues, we refuse to deal with it. It is amazing. We cannot get an argument about what the cause is. Not a single soul will stand up and argue about the cause here for this pollution. We know exactly what creates it; but we categorically refuse to deal with it because the subject is difficult to deal with because it is not politically correct to talk about it as a result of human traffic, illegal traffic into this country.

There are huge, huge economic benefits that accrue to certain groups, to certain businesses, to certain individuals to have lots and lots of cheap labor. There are political advantages that accrue to others to have lots and lots of immigration into the country. These two things, the political advantage, the economic benefit of cheap labor and illegal immigration, stop this from being addressed. It is a shame at least. It needs to be addressed. It needs at least to be debated.

Maybe I am wrong, maybe I am 100 percent wrong about what is happening. Maybe this report is just fabricated, just a bunch of lies that somebody wrote down because they have it in for immigrants. Go there yourself if you think I am exaggerating this problem. I encourage Members to go there themselves and observe it, observe the Organ Pipe National dump and see whether Mr. Eggle, Mr. Robert Eggle whose son was killed at Organ Pipe a year ago August, his son was killed there by two people who had come through after killing four other people in Mexico, part of a drug deal. They came into the United States and they came up against Kris Eggle. He was a park ranger, and he was not trained and he did not have the equipment to deal with terrorists. That is who they were. And they cut him down with an AK-47. We went to where he was killed, and Bob said the following: "If they do not get the crime situation under control, they are not going to have any resources left to protect." That was quoted in Outside Magazine February 2003. His son lies dead. The environment is being destroyed. Hundreds of illegals are dead in the desert, all because we do not have the guts in this body to take this issue on.

Americans do, I assure Members of that. Poll after poll after poll will tell us that Americans believe we have to do something to control our borders, something to reduce immigration to a manageable level. I have a bill that would reduce immigration, annual legal immigration into the United States to 300,000 a year. That is far more than came into the United States during the heyday of immigration of the early 1900s. I am accused of trying to build a Berlin Wall.

And how can we create a bill for guest workers to come into this country legally, how can we say we have some sort of legal immigration number by say 300,000 or 3 million, how can we say that if the borders are porous? It does not matter how many the government says we will allow in or how many workers we will take in as a temporary basis. As long as the borders are porous, they will come at their will, not according to what our needs are. And they will pollute.

The only way to defend this Nation against the danger that exists as a result of terrorist activity, the only way to defend this Nation in terms of the drugs that are imported across this border every single day, the only way to defend the environment in this Nation is to put the military on the border to augment our border patrol and our Forest Service personnel and stop this degradation of the land and stop the invasion. That is the only solution to the problem. The only one. Nothing else will work.

We must use the military to defend our borders against the invasion until the Department of Homeland Security can effectively control this problem. Until then, the invasion goes on. Our homes are threatened, our lives are threatened, our environment is being destroyed. Let us not shy away from that on the House floor. It is our duty, it is our sworn duty to take on these kinds of issues, and I urge Members to do just that.

END



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Mexico; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Maine; US: New Mexico; US: Texas; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: borders; congress; ecosilence; environmentaldamage; homelandsecurity; organpipe; sierraclub; tomtancredo; trash; vehicles

1 posted on 04/10/2003 9:51:53 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; B4Ranch; FITZ; farmfriend; Reaganwuzthebest; Tancredo Fan; Joe Hadenuf; 4Freedom; ...
Tancredo speech ping! Envirals silence!
2 posted on 04/10/2003 9:59:48 AM PDT by madfly (AZFIRE.org, NATURALPROCESS.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

"It's Time to Pony Up".


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-


3 posted on 04/10/2003 10:02:00 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
bttt for the Eviros silence. But of course they are but Red revolutionaries scamming Sally Soccer Mom and her backpack husband out of money and not concerned about the enviroment.
4 posted on 04/10/2003 12:11:41 PM PDT by junta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
As usual, a great speech by Tom. Is anyone listening?
5 posted on 04/10/2003 1:34:06 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
bttt
6 posted on 04/10/2003 2:04:24 PM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
bttt
7 posted on 04/10/2003 2:04:25 PM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
bttt
8 posted on 04/10/2003 2:04:26 PM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
How long? How long will it take to get some help?
9 posted on 04/10/2003 2:19:09 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
How long? How long will it take to get some help?
10 posted on 04/10/2003 2:19:10 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thesis - Antithesis - Synthesis and bait-and-switch

Constitution of the United States

One of Congress' fully defined duties:

Article 4

Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.

The US should not have standing armies in times of PEACE, which we would still have if we would not meddle in others' affairs [George Washington] and if we had demanded and Congress had provided the above [protection from illegal invasion].

Article 1

Section 8. The Congress shall have power ......

To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful BUILDINGS; [Disregard this by seizing at least 40% of the total land in US, setting it basically off-limits to the citizens of the US, so that it can be invaded for a long period of time without notice]

and disregard this......

....To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years

so that When the situation reaches crisis level, it is safe to reveal to the populace that there is a problem that needs addressing immediately

This will justify a standing army.

Section 9

No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay.

This invasion should properly met by the PEOPLE's militia composed of any affected landowners and other affected residents, who would probably be only too happy to oblige. A standing army in the hands of a police state mentality run amock in this country would be too dangerous, particulary since we have reciprocal agreements with Canada and NATO. Classic bait-and-switch says 'troops on the border' will be expanded to deal with terrorists (i.e., 'Christian fundamentalists', gun-owners, and people who actually believe in the Constitution - defined as terrorists by such un-American writings as the FBI's 'Project Megiddo', 'Patriot Acts I and II', that Arizona FBI flyer, etc.:

Section 8

....To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;

Tancredo is 100% right about the problem, but I'm not so sure about his solution. We're constantly played for the fool, and we usually bite. My two cents.

11 posted on 04/10/2003 2:34:13 PM PDT by Ethan_Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
BTTT
12 posted on 04/10/2003 4:35:42 PM PDT by Dust in the Wind (¡Si usted permanece en este país, usted debe aprender es el idioma oficial!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
I just wrote Jane Harman about this outrage, asked her if she heard Tom Tancredo's speech, and asked her if she was outraged, and if not, why? I asked her what she intended to do about it. I'll post her reply if I get one.
13 posted on 04/10/2003 6:39:20 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
BTTT
14 posted on 04/10/2003 8:09:44 PM PDT by Ches (Mrs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
No....
15 posted on 04/10/2003 8:24:54 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
bttt
16 posted on 04/11/2003 6:49:41 AM PDT by madfly (AZFIRE.org, NATURALPROCESS.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: madfly

Tom Revere

17 posted on 04/11/2003 9:15:11 PM PDT by Barnacle (A human shield against the onslaught of Liberal tripe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
Tom Tancredo, American Statesman
Tom Tancredo
American Statesman


18 posted on 04/12/2003 7:48:38 AM PDT by madfly (AZFIRE.org, NATURALPROCESS.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: madfly
bump for later reading
19 posted on 04/12/2003 5:29:49 PM PDT by 4.1O dana super trac pak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bttt
20 posted on 04/13/2003 8:18:37 AM PDT by madfly (AZFIRE.org, NATURALPROCESS.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson