Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why hasn't there been a series of "Mogudishus" yet?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/ambush/readings/joyce.html ^ | October 20, 1993 | Larry E Joyce

Posted on 04/09/2003 8:28:52 PM PDT by risk

by Larry E. Joyce USA TODAY October 20, 1993

U.S. Army Rangers are the most highly motivated and best-trained soldiers in the world. They volunteer four times: They volunteer to be soldiers. They volunteer to be paratroopers. They volunteer to serve in one of three elite Ranger battalions. Then, they voluntarily stay in a Ranger unit despite grueling physical and emotionally draining assignments.

They are kept in places like Panama, England, Korea, Egypt and Thailand for weeks at a time. They can walk away and join a less demanding assignment any time - no questions asked.

They are a national treasure. I'm proud my son chose to be an Army Ranger. He died in the arms of the finest soldiers this nation ever produced. I only wish I could have been there to fight at his side. But now, I'm questioning why he died.

Last December, we sent 21,000 troops to Somalia to provide security for a humanitarian mission. Once that was completed, all but 4,700 came home. Of those 4,700, only about 300 were combat troops - including 145 Rangers who were sent there in late August. And, suddenly, with this bare-bones force and no American armor or mechanized equipment and troops, the mission changed to one of very direct combat.

Who changed the mission? The United Nations? The multinational commander on the ground in Somalia?

Who in the American chain of command concurred? The president? The secretary of State? The secretary of Defense?

From all we've learned since the tragic events of Oct. 3, the senior American military officers - including Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Colin Powell - requested tanks and armor-protected troop carriers from Secretary of Defense Les Aspin. They were repeatedly rebuffed. Why?

Rangers are highly mobile because they travel lightly. This means they are lightly armed. Light infantry should never be committed with no means of reinforcement.

Did Maj. Gen. Thomas Montgomery, the senior American officer in Somalia, demand U.N. reinforcements be assembled and placed in reserve? The Pakistanis and Malaysians had tanks and armored personnel carriers, but it took them over three hours to make the decision to move. They arrived 10 hours after the battle began. Did Montgomery make their ready involvement a prerequisite for using our Rangers? If not, why not?

Now a question for President Clinton. Why is Les Aspin our secretary of Defense? Why is a man who made a career of criticizing and reviling the military put in charge of the military? This makes as much sense as appointing an atheist to be a cardinal.

I've spoken to parents and loved ones of other Rangers who were killed or wounded in Mogadishu. I've spoken to several Rangers who served with my son - some of them were wounded. I don't want to suggest that I'm speaking for any of them, but maybe I am.

I certainly think it's reasonable to ask for them and for all concerned Americans that a thorough investigation of this debacle be conducted immediately, and the results be made public. Those who are responsible must be held accountable.

Mr. President, start with Aspin. He is too uncaring and too incompetent to command the most precious resource this nation has. At the very least, Mr. President, seek advice on military affairs from the professionals in uniform who are eager to serve you - not from politicians or people who are experts in manipulating public opinion.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: baghdad; iraq; lesaspin; mogudishu; somalia
urban warfare
I saw a mention of former Defense Secretary Les Aspin today that caught my full attention when I came across the following comments on why we might be easily victorious in Iraq via a link at http://www.aldaily.com/ to The Ugly Time:
But all historical, and even romantic notions of urban warfare by inspired irregulars need to be set aside this time. This will not be Mogadishu (remember when Defense Secretary Les Aspin would not allow any U.S. armor in to support American forces?). This will not be Grozny, or Chechnya, or the Intifada.

Any Iraqis fighting as "SIAFs" (small independent action forces) will be subjected to withering counterforce. They will face the highly articulated use of artillery and air strikes. They will encounter the best armor in the world with protective screens of infantry and helicopters to obviate the effectiveness of close in rear attacks on our tanks. They will be dealing with U.S. and British troops and Special Forces wearing body armor, who are highly skilled in force protection and able, even eager, to fight at night.

I don't want to downplay the possibility that Iraqis didn't really want to fight for Saddam, but it's clear that our troops are much more successful when led by the likes of Franks and directed by Rumsfeld.

Peace through strength!

1 posted on 04/09/2003 8:28:52 PM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


2 posted on 04/09/2003 8:29:51 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: risk
Why hasn't there been a series of "Mogudishus" yet?

Because the Commander in Chief allowed us to use armor & air support

3 posted on 04/09/2003 8:33:43 PM PDT by Ford Fairlane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ford Fairlane
Ford -- What you meant to say, doubtless, was:

'Because THIS Commander-In-Chief....'

As opposed to his predecessor, Scumbag Humjob.

4 posted on 04/09/2003 8:39:07 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: risk; Paul Atreides
Why hasn't there been a series of "Mogudishus" yet?

Because this man is no longer the President...


5 posted on 04/09/2003 8:40:11 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ford Fairlane; kattracks
Because the Commander in Chief allowed us to use armor & air support

Yes, the tide of appeasement has finally been abated. What was Aspin thinking?

6 posted on 04/09/2003 8:40:27 PM PDT by risk (we shall never surrender --Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ford Fairlane
Me and friend were talking about that idiot professor from Columbia University the other day. What kind of fool would want a 1000 Mogadishu’s?

If person does the simple math on a thousand Mogadishu’s. We dropped 125 rangers and operators in to a meet grinder and we lost 18, I believe. And we fell over 3000 enemies. Takes those stats by 1000

18000 of our guys dead And over 3 million dead enemies.

What the hell kind of person would wish this kind of destruction would happen.

The people on the left are insane
7 posted on 04/09/2003 8:44:32 PM PDT by ezo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
At this moment, there is only one Commander in Chief...

You know what I meant

I know some guys who were in Somalia that would like to insert a 120mm gun in Scumbag Humjob's rectal area

8 posted on 04/09/2003 8:45:09 PM PDT by Ford Fairlane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ford Fairlane
BINGO!
9 posted on 04/09/2003 8:47:45 PM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: risk
Interesting...Bush has helped define Clinton's legacy today.
10 posted on 04/09/2003 9:09:43 PM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ezoeni
What kind of fool would want a 1000 Mogadishu’s

He asked for a million. When the left goes berserk, it doesn't think small.

11 posted on 04/10/2003 12:52:12 AM PDT by risk (Come and get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson