Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freebird Forever; bigfootbob
If plants exist that display a tolerance or resistance to this fungus, how difficult would it be for that trait to be selected and incorporated into susceptible species?

I would guess that it is only selectively possible. If there are resistant specimens among a species one might be able to identify that genetic trait and cross-breed it into new individuals. NOTHING can be done for existing specimens genetically that way. Even if they did identify resistant alleles, they would still have to distribute that trait. By pollen seeding? Who knows, there are a lot of trees out there and that is a lot of pollen (in tonnage). Finally, propoagating many native plants by seed is no picnic. The research is very primitive. I am actually doing a little on plant propagation in my spare opportunistic moments that improve the ability to reintroduce local stock in the field. I have an air-layering process for manzanita that is not in the literature and am fooling around with charate instead of fire-scarification on manzanita seed.

Another tack might be to identify a parasite of the disease (a bacteria or virus that would consume or infect phytophthora alone) or something that inhibits its action in the host by more successfully occupuying the niche in advance. Both strike me as high-risk options.

It's bad. It could have been prevented. The system needs to change before it happens again. If we can instute that change we may have more success at finding solutions. That's the real message here.

27 posted on 04/09/2003 12:43:25 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
"I have an air-layering process for manzanita that is not in the literature and am fooling around with charate instead of fire-scarification on manzanita seed."

That sounds interesting. Have you had any success yet?

29 posted on 04/09/2003 12:49:54 PM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie
It's bad. It could have been prevented. The system needs to change before it happens again. If we can instute that change we may have more success at finding solutions. That's the real message here.

So true. If you look at the collapse of the Atlantic Groundfish stocks off of Newfoundland, etc, you'll see that bad science was to blame for much of the initial stock depletion not being more quickly noted and addressed. Local fisherman told government folks what was going on, what they saw in their catch. Even deep fishing companiesa were reporting changes in their catch. The government officials, the folks charged in part with managing the groundfish, used kooky science to the point that the cod and other species collapsed in the mid-90's.

And then the envirowhackos blamed it on the fishing industry! Of course, some countries were illegally fishing, but you have to look long and hard at the government.

37 posted on 04/09/2003 2:28:22 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson