Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jla
"intellectual vanity* and a neurotic guilty conscious."

Alright...here's the REAL TRUE ANSWER, IMHO...it's Power!! Specifically, the Centralization of Power in as few hands as possible!! Why else would ABCCBSNBCCNN be so unanimously AGAINST the De-Centralization of Power from DeeCee and into the State Capitals and Country Courthouses and City Halls?! The RAT-controlled Networks need homogenized NATIONAL NEWS which requires NATION-WIDE CRISISES so that the Federal Leviathan can implement yet another NATIONAL PROGRAM that the Leftist RAT-Medyuh WHORE'D can trumpet as some sorta solution!! Therefore, the RATS are forced to paint Proponents of DisEmpowering the Fed in favor of Empowering States, Localities, Neighborhoods, Families and Individuals as EVIL Un-Compassionate Cretins, when in fact our solutions ALWAYS OutPerform the Leftists' ideas...ALWAYS!!

That's why 90% of the VastLeftWingMedyuhWhore'd supports the RATS Socialist Agenda...MUD

420 posted on 02/16/2003 6:50 PM EST by Mudboy Slim (Git the US Outta the UN...and Git the UN Outta the US!!!)
408 posted on 04/15/2003 12:07:34 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (Let America PROPOSE a NEW League of Nations...The League of FReeNations!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMan55; Grampa Dave; Common Tator; Landru; PhiKapMom
"Anti-American Corruption RAMPANT at CNN!!"

"I took part in meetings between the CNN executives and various officials purported to be close to Saddam. We met with his personal translator; with a foreign affairs adviser; with Information Minister Latif Jassim; and with Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz. In each of these meetings, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Jordan made their pitch: Saddam Hussein would have an hour's time on CNN's worldwide network; there would be no interruptions, no commercials. I was astonished. From both the tone and the content of these conversations, it seemed to me that CNN was virtually groveling for the interview. The day after one such meeting, I was on the roof of the Ministry of Information, preparing for my first "live shot" on CNN. A producer came up and handed me a sheet of paper with handwritten notes. "Tom Johnson wants you to read this on camera," he said. I glanced at the paper. It was an item-by-item summary of points made by Information Minister Latif Jassim in an interview that morning with Mr. Johnson and Mr. Jordan. The list was so long that there was no time during the live shot to provide context. I read the information minister's points verbatim. Moments later, I was downstairs in the newsroom on the first floor of the Information Ministry. Mr. Johnson approached, having seen my performance on a TV monitor. "You were a bit flat there, Peter," he said. Again, I was astonished. The president of CNN was telling me I seemed less-than-enthusiastic reading Saddam Hussein's propaganda. The next day, I was CNN's reporter on a trip organized by the Ministry of Information to the northern city of Mosul. "Minders" from the ministry accompanied two busloads of news people to an open, plowed field outside Mosul. The purpose was to show us that American warplanes were bombing "innocent Iraqi farmers." Bits of American ordinance were scattered on the field. One large piece was marked "CBU." I recognized it as the canister for a Cluster Bomb Unit, a weapon effective against troops in the open, or against "thin-skinned" armor. I was puzzled. Why would U.S. aircraft launch CBUs against what appeared to be an open field? Was it really to kill "innocent Iraqi farmers?" The minders showed us no victims, no witnesses. I looked around. About 2000 yards distant on a ridgeline, two radar dishes were just visible against the sky. The ground was freshly plowed. Now, I understood. The radars were probably linked to Soviet-made SA-6 surface-to-air missiles mounted on tracks, armored vehicles, parked in the field at some distance from the dishes to keep them safe. After the bombing, the Iraqis had removed the missile launchers and had plowed the field to cover the tracks. On the way back to Baghdad, I explained to other reporters what I thought had happened, and wrote a report that was broadcast on CNN that night. The next day, Brent Sadler, CNN's chief reporter at the time in Baghdad (he is now in northern Iraq), came up to me in a hallway of the al Rasheed Hotel. He had been pushing for the interview with Saddam and had urged Mr. Johnson and Mr. Jordan to come to Baghdad to help seal the deal. "Petah," he said to me in his English accent, "you know we're trying to get an interview with Saddam. That piece last night was not helpful." So, we were supposed to shade the news to get an interview with Saddam? As it happens, CNN never did get that interview. A few months later, I had passed my probationary period and was contemplating my future with CNN. I thought long and hard; could I be comfortable with a news organization that played those kinds of games? I decided, no, I could not, and resigned."

Heard El Rushbo talkin' 'bout this today...ASTOUNDING!!!

I wanna hear about MASS TOP-ECHELON RESIGNATIONS at CNN...MUD

409 posted on 04/15/2003 12:40:50 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (Let America PROPOSE a NEW League of Nations...The League of FReeNations!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson