Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: proust
Another possibility: The sniper story was quick cover-your-ass comment by a tank commander who missed the top story of some building near the river. The hotel was over a mile away. This will probably turn out to be an overshoot. There was no second tank round.

If the US wanted the hotel taken out, there would be no hotel.
542 posted on 04/08/2003 11:27:45 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies ]


To: John Jamieson
That was my point earlier - I had noticed that there was a two story building between the tanks and the hotel. This shorter building had a snipers nest on top of it (sandbags).
545 posted on 04/08/2003 11:29:30 PM PDT by dsmtoday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies ]

To: John Jamieson
One of the early reports I heard was that the tank was firing at the top of the building (didn't detail which bldg) and missed....interesting possibility...
549 posted on 04/08/2003 11:31:48 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies ]

To: John Jamieson
dpends on which gun they used. It looks like the tank commanders M2 50 cal machine gun, or the gunners M240 7.62mm coax machine took out the cameraman. Both guns are accurate up to 1 mile. The main gun is accuate up to 2 miles.
553 posted on 04/08/2003 11:33:29 PM PDT by proust (Hello, Cthulhu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson