To: All
I don't have cable, and I don't have DSL. That is to say, as I peek over my rock for the first time today, I wonder if the incident of killed journalists yesterday has yet been described as "friendly fire"?
My guess is never. We've lost too many to this oxymoron, and I don't see why it doesn't apply to this one -- other than to fulfill an agenda. Had we the 24-hour head-bang over U.S.-to-U.S. losses?
The press righteousness disgusts me.
149 posted on
04/08/2003 9:42:33 PM PDT by
nicollo
To: All
Screw those journalists....
Dang, I love Shep....
163 posted on
04/08/2003 9:45:30 PM PDT by
najida
(Ignorance is temporary, but stupidity is forever.)
To: nicollo
It was not friendly fire when the two reporters were killed. Our troops were being fired upon by snipers (at least that's the way I've heard it three our of four times). The reporters (God bless their souls) happened to be in the way.
This is a war. It's dangerous to be in Baghdad, and all the reporters that are not embedded with the troops are in danger.
170 posted on
04/08/2003 9:46:56 PM PDT by
Slip18
To: nicollo
I don't have cable, and I don't have DSL. That is to say, as I peek over my rock for the first time today, I wonder if the incident of killed journalists yesterday has yet been described as "friendly fire"? Friendly fire is when you hit someone on YOUR SIDE.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson