Skip to comments.
Beyond the veto-The options open to the UN in deligitimising a US invasion of Iraq
Al Ahram
| 4-9-03
| Ayman El-Amir
Posted on 04/08/2003 5:42:34 PM PDT by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
04/08/2003 5:42:34 PM PDT
by
SJackson
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
2
posted on
04/08/2003 5:43:04 PM PDT
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
Without U.S. dollars there would be no U.N. so I guess we can do whatever we please. Basically the author is admitting that the U.N. is useless. Well tell us something we don't know!
To: SJackson
Their charter went out the window the moment the body failed to give any meaning to paragraph 13 of Resolution 1441:
13. RECALLS, in that context, that the council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations;
4
posted on
04/08/2003 5:53:26 PM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: SJackson
Any General Assembly resolution denouncing the aggression against Iraq and demanding the cessation of hostilities and the withdrawal of foreign troops under the Uniting for Peace provision, will..."delegitimise" the Anglo-American conquest of Iraq... No, it will "delegitimise" the UN. Please, resolve away.
To: SJackson
"There was a time when any outbreak of hostilities would be immediately followed by the convening of the Security Council which would call for a cease-fire, followed by withdrawal of military forces and negotiations."
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
6
posted on
04/08/2003 5:59:47 PM PDT
by
Chameleon
To: SJackson
Its founding fathers could never have imagined, in their worst nightmares, that the world body would be reduced to a New York-style "soup kitchen" for the distribution of free meals to refugees.
Even this will be botched up by the U.N.
7
posted on
04/08/2003 6:07:53 PM PDT
by
polemikos
To: Chameleon
So well put!
8
posted on
04/08/2003 6:16:19 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: SJackson
Well, that's the way the cookie crumbles, phai khong?
9
posted on
04/08/2003 6:24:12 PM PDT
by
arthurus
To: polemikos
The whole damned UN staff are a bunch of refugees from the realities of the countries they have fled who are happily eating luxuriously at this elegant high-rise soup kitchen in New York where the expatriot effete meet to eat, stomp their feet, bleat, tweet and discreetly excrete.
To: mathurine
"...and discreetly excrete..."
I would probably not say that the UN refugee thugs use discretion in the spread of their excrement. It is time to shovel the UN -- high-rise, excrement and freeloading staff into the East River and help it on its way to oblivion somewhere in the depths of the Atlantic!
To: mathurine
The twerps can only denounce America and remind American taxpayers why its time to stop letting them bite the hand that feeds them. This American is fed up their arrogance.
12
posted on
04/08/2003 7:20:28 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(Lara Logan Doesn't Hold A Candle Next To BellyGirl :))
To: SJackson
And we care what Ayman El-Amir has to say why?? He should STFU and listen to what the average Iraqi citizen is saying instead of Baghdad Bob. This is just more crying over the end of so many authoritarian regimes in the face of a free Iraq.
All your UN are belong to US, camelhumper.
13
posted on
04/08/2003 7:21:38 PM PDT
by
11B3
(.308 holes make invisible souls. Belt fed liberal eraser.)
To: SJackson
These UN'rs certainly do live in their own world, don't they? It's like a religion to them.
They will never accept that their god is dead.
14
posted on
04/08/2003 7:30:10 PM PDT
by
Search4Truth
(Liberalism, Feminism, and Political Correctness are against the laws of Nature and God.)
To: SJackson
HEY AYMAN: WE DIDN'T GIVE YOU PERMISSION TO SPEAK.
15
posted on
04/08/2003 7:44:17 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Wheat is Murder! (Tilling slaughters worms.....))
To: SJackson
The group's veto-empowered allies in the council, France and Russia, cautioned that failure to garner the two-third majority would indirectly legitimise the US-British campaign. They wanted to deny the two powers any de jure legitimacy, even as a de facto invasion of Iraq is underway. It is a strategy leaving much to be desired.
It's a bitch when it cuts both ways, ain't it?
Its [United Nations] founding fathers could never have imagined, in their worst nightmares, that the world body would be reduced to a New York-style "soup kitchen" for the distribution of free meals to refugees.
Welcome to your nightmare.
To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
I agree with you, of course, but I was running out of rhymes
18
posted on
04/08/2003 7:51:04 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
To: mathurine
That is EXACTLY what I was going to say!
19
posted on
04/08/2003 7:53:41 PM PDT
by
kcar
To: polemikos
Have you been following the UN's "Food for Sex" program?
Funny, it doesn't get that much play in the US lamestream media.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson